Literature DB >> 20627829

Anthropometry and socioeconomics among couples: evidence in the United States.

Sonia Oreffice1, Climent Quintana-Domeque.   

Abstract

We analyze the marriage-market aspects of weight and height in the United States using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics on anthropometric characteristics of both spouses. We find evidence of positive sorting in spouses' body mass index (BMI), weight, and height. Within couples, gender-asymmetric trade-offs arise not only between physical and socioeconomic attributes, but also between anthropometric attributes, with significant penalties for fatter women and shorter men. A wife's obesity (BMI or weight) measures are negatively correlated with her husband's income, education, and height, controlling for his weight and her height, along with spouses' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Conversely, heavier husbands are not penalized by matching with poorer or less educated wives, but only with shorter ones. Height is valued mainly for men, with shorter men matched with heavier and less educated wives.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20627829     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2010.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  6 in total

1.  The gender gap in relation to happiness and preferences in married couples after childbirth: evidence from a field experiment in rural Ghana.

Authors:  Yusuke Kamiya; Bright Akpalu; Emmanuel Mahama; Emmanuel Kwesi Ayipah; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Abraham Hodgson; Akira Shibanuma; Kimiyo Kikuchi; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Simulations and directed acyclic graphs explained why assortative mating biases the prenatal negative control design.

Authors:  Paul Madley-Dowd; Dheeraj Rai; Stanley Zammit; Jon Heron
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings?

Authors:  Gert Stulp; Abraham P Buunk; Thomas V Pollet; Daniel Nettle; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Timing of Obesity Matters: Associations Between Current Versus Chronic Obesity since Adolescence and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction Among Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Aletha Y Akers; Jennifer Harding
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-06-12

5.  Childbearing is not associated with young women's long-term obesity risk.

Authors:  Whitney R Robinson; Mariah M Cheng; Katherine J Hoggatt; Til Stürmer; Anna M Siega-Riz
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Young adults' BMI and changes in romantic relationship status during the first semester of college.

Authors:  Irene van Woerden; Alexandra Brewis; Daniel Hruschka; Genevieve Dunton; Marc A Adams; Meg Bruening
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.