P Ellwood1, M I Asher, A W Stewart. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Child and Youth Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. p.ellwood@auckland.ac.nz
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Centres in Phases I and III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) programme used the method of consent (passive or active) required by local ethics committees. METHODS: Retrospectively, relationships between achieved response rates and method of consent for 13-14 and 6-7-year-olds (adolescents and children, respectively), were examined between phases and between English and non-English language centres. RESULTS: Information was obtained for 113 of 115 centres for adolescents and 72/72 centres for children. Both age groups: most centres using passive consent achieved high response rates (>80% adolescents and >70% children). English language centres using active consent showed a larger decrease in response rate. Adolescents: seven centres changed from passive consent in Phase I to active consent in Phase III (median decrease of 13%), with five centres showing lower response rates (as low as 34%). Children: no centre changed consent method between phases. Centres using active consent had lower median response rates (lowest response rate 45%). CONCLUSION: The requirement for active consent for population school-based questionnaire studies can impact negatively on response rates, particularly English language centres, thus adversely affecting the validity of the data. Ethics committees need to consider this issue carefully.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Centres in Phases I and III of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) programme used the method of consent (passive or active) required by local ethics committees. METHODS: Retrospectively, relationships between achieved response rates and method of consent for 13-14 and 6-7-year-olds (adolescents and children, respectively), were examined between phases and between English and non-English language centres. RESULTS: Information was obtained for 113 of 115 centres for adolescents and 72/72 centres for children. Both age groups: most centres using passive consent achieved high response rates (>80% adolescents and >70% children). English language centres using active consent showed a larger decrease in response rate. Adolescents: seven centres changed from passive consent in Phase I to active consent in Phase III (median decrease of 13%), with five centres showing lower response rates (as low as 34%). Children: no centre changed consent method between phases. Centres using active consent had lower median response rates (lowest response rate 45%). CONCLUSION: The requirement for active consent for population school-based questionnaire studies can impact negatively on response rates, particularly English language centres, thus adversely affecting the validity of the data. Ethics committees need to consider this issue carefully.
Authors: Tadd Clayton; M Innes Asher; Julian Crane; Philippa Ellwood; Richard Mackay; Edwin A Mitchell; Chris D Moyes; Philip Pattemore; Neil Pearce; Alistair W Stewart Journal: Asia Pac Allergy Date: 2013-07-30
Authors: Yim Wah Mak; Cynthia Sau Ting Wu; Donna Wing Shun Hui; Siu Ping Lam; Hei Yin Tse; Wing Yan Yu; Ho Ting Wong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Valerie Carson; Jo Salmon; Lauren Arundell; Nicola D Ridgers; Ester Cerin; Helen Brown; Kylie D Hesketh; Kylie Ball; Mai Chinapaw; Mine Yildirim; Robin M Daly; David W Dunstan; David Crawford Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Edwin A Mitchell; Alistair W Stewart; Irene Braithwaite; Rinki Murphy; Robert J Hancox; Clare Wall; Richard Beasley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Barbara K Butland; H Ross Anderson; Aaron van Donkelaar; Elaine Fuertes; Michael Brauer; Bert Brunekreef; Randall V Martin Journal: Air Qual Atmos Health Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: J Araújo-Martins; P Carreiro Martins; J Viegas; D Aelenei; M M Cano; J P Teixeira; P Paixão; A L Papoila; P Leiria-Pinto; C Pedro; J Rosado-Pinto; I Annesi-Maesano; N Neuparth Journal: Rev Port Pneumol Date: 2014-04-18