| Literature DB >> 20626887 |
Irene Riezzo1, Margherita Neri, Francesco De Stefano, Ezio Fulcheri, Francesco Ventura, Cristoforo Pomara, Roberto Rabozzi, Emanuela Turillazzi, Vittorio Fineschi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The understanding of the cellular responses implicated in perinatal brain damages and the characterization of the various mechanisms involved might open new horizons for understanding the time of onset of a brain hypoxic-ischemic lesion and for effective therapeutic strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20626887 PMCID: PMC2914029 DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-5-49
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Pathol ISSN: 1746-1596 Impact factor: 2.644
Panel of antibodies selected in the study
| Antibody against | Pre--treatment | Incubation time of primary antibody, temperature | Concentration of primary antibody |
|---|---|---|---|
| GFAP (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark) | No pre-treatment | 120 min, 20°C | 1:300 |
| TNFα (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) | boiling in 0.1 M Citric Acid buffer. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:600 |
| IL-1β (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) | boiling in 0.25 mM EDTA buffer. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:4000 |
| IL-6 (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) | 5 min Proteolytic Enzyme (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark), 20°C. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:2000 |
| CD68 (Serotec, United Kingdom) | 5 min Proteolytic Enzyme (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark), 20°C. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:200 |
| HSP 27 (NovaCastra, United Kingdom) | boiling in 0.25 mM EDTA buffer.. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:20 |
| HSP 70 (NovaCastra, United Kingdom) | boiling in 0.25 mM EDTA buffer.. | Overnight, 20°C | 1:100 |
| HSP 90 (NovaCastra, United Kingdom) | boiling in 0.25 mM EDTA buffer.. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:50 |
| COX2 (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) | 5 min Proteolytic Enzyme (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark), 20°C. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:100 |
| ORP-150 (IBL, Gunma, Japan) | boiling in 0.1 M Citric Acid buffer. | 120 min, 20°C | 1:200 |
| β-APP (NovaCastra, United Kingdom) | boiling in 0.1 M Citric Acid buffer. | Overnight, 20°C | 1:300 |
| TrypH (NovaCastra, United Kingdom) | boiling in 0.1 M Citric Acid buffer. | Overnight, 20°C | 1:50 |
| GAP-43 (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) | boiling in 0.1 M Citric Acid buffer | 120 min, 20°C | 1:2000 |
| TdT enzyme (Chemicon, CA, USA) | 15 min in Proteinase K (20 μg/ml), 20°C | 60 min, 38°C | 30 μl of TdT in 70 μl of reaction buffer (Chemicon, CA, USA) |
Figure 1Pathological findings in acute and non-acute groups.
Figure 2(A) CTG tracing. Sudden decelerations (arrow) that do not recover: urgent delivery ("rescue") is indicated. This tracing permits the diagnosis that the fetus (40ws.) suffered an acute, rather profound, ischemic event just prior to delivery due to the mother's prolonged cardiac arrest. (B-C) Same case as in (A): CT (midventricular level) appearance with enlarged lateral ventricles and generalized brain swelling at autopsy. (D) Histology of the cortical layer shows it to be oedematous with nuclear pyknosis.
Figure 3(A) In non-acute cases (~10 hs) HSP70 reaction was prominent in the neuron cytoplasm of the affected regions. (B) (insert) Confocal laser scanning microscope: typical morphological features of neuronal (green) apoptosis associated with marked condensation of chromatin and its fragmentation into discrete bodies. (C-D) In acute cases a mild HSP70 reaction was evident in sporadic fields.
Figure 4Immunohistochemical staining for HSP90 at 12 hs (A-B) and at 15 hs (C) exhibited an intense reaction in the cytoplasm of the neurons. The reaction must be compared with acute case (≤8 hs) (D) in which a mildly granular reaction is evident in the neurons.
Figure 5ORP150 immunohistochemical expression related to cell viability: (A-B) in non-acute case we detected mildly neuron reaction and positive astrocytes stain. (C) Strong neuron reaction to ORP150 in acute case. (D) Confocal laser scanning microscope: cortical layers showed intense and diffuse reactions granular pattern in the cytoplasm of the neurons (ORP150 reaction is in orange).
Figure 6Confocal laser scanning microscope: COX2 positivity at (A) vascular level demonstrated in (C) too. (B) COX2 immunolabeling was prominent in the glial cytoplasm in the non-acute cases while (D) COX2 reaction exhibited a strong positive reaction in the neuronal cell bodies in the acute cases.
Results of immunohistochemical markers response in glial cells
| Acute (A) (≤8 hs) Median Expression | Non-acute (NA) (≥8 hs ≤48 hs) Median Expression | Controls (C) Median Expression | Significant Significance Level Levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +++ | +++ | +++ | A vs C | ns | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| - | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| - | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| - | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| ++ | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | ** | ||||
| - | - | - | A vs C | ns | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| + | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| + | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| ++ | - | A vs C | *** | ||
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| - | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| + | ++ | ++ | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| - | - | - | A vs C | ns | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| - | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| + | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
The reactions were graded as follows: 1. (0): not expressed, 2. (+): isolated and disseminated expression, 3. (++): expression in groups or widespread foci, 4. (+++): widespread expression.
NS = p > 0.05, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001
Results of immunohistochemical markers response in neurons
| Acute (A) (≤8 hs) Median Expression | Non-acute (NA) (≥8 hs ≤48 hs) Median Expression | Controls (C) Median Expression | Significance Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | A vs C | ns | ||
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| - | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| + | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| - | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| - | - | - | A vs C | ns | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| - | - | - | A vs C | ns | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| + | +++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| + | +++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| +++ | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | ** | ||||
| ++ | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | *** | ||||
| A vs NA | ** | ||||
| + | +++ | ++ | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ** | ||||
| A vs NA | ** | ||||
| - | + | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
| - | - | - | A vs C | ns | |
| NA vs C | ns | ||||
| A vs NA | ns | ||||
| + | ++ | - | A vs C | *** | |
| NA vs C | ** | ||||
| A vs NA | *** | ||||
The reactions were graded as follows: 1. (0): not expressed, 2. (+): isolated and disseminated expression, 3. (++): expression in groups or widespread foci, 4. (+++): widespread expression.
NS = p > 0.05, * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001