Literature DB >> 20626690

Anthropic shadow: observation selection effects and human extinction risks.

Milan M Cirković1, Anders Sandberg, Nick Bostrom.   

Abstract

We describe a significant practical consequence of taking anthropic biases into account in deriving predictions for rare stochastic catastrophic events. The risks associated with catastrophes such as asteroidal/cometary impacts, supervolcanic episodes, and explosions of supernovae/gamma-ray bursts are based on their observed frequencies. As a result, the frequencies of catastrophes that destroy or are otherwise incompatible with the existence of observers are systematically underestimated. We describe the consequences of this anthropic bias for estimation of catastrophic risks, and suggest some directions for future work.
© 2010 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20626690     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01460.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  5 in total

1.  Evolvability Is an Evolved Ability: The Coding Concept as the Arch-Unit of Natural Selection.

Authors:  Srdja Janković; Milan M Ćirković
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Questioning Estimates of Natural Pandemic Risk.

Authors:  David Manheim
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2018-11-29

3.  Existential risks: exploring a robust risk reduction strategy.

Authors:  Karim Jebari
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  An upper bound for the background rate of human extinction.

Authors:  Andrew E Snyder-Beattie; Toby Ord; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Assessing natural global catastrophic risks.

Authors:  Seth D Baum
Journal:  Nat Hazards (Dordr)       Date:  2022-10-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.