Literature DB >> 20626604

Efficacy and safety of oral mirodenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in diabetic men in Korea: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Hyun Jun Park1, Hyung Ki Choi, Tai Young Ahn, Jong Kwan Park, Woo Sik Chung, Sung Won Lee, Sae Woong Kim, Jae Seog Hyun, Nam Cheol Park.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mirodenafil is a newly developed selective phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). AIM: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirodenafil in the treatment of ED in Korean men with diabetes.
METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study was conducted with 112 subjects who were randomized to either placebo or mirodenafil 100 mg on demand for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary efficacy variable was the erectile function (EF) domain scores of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) questionnaire. Secondary efficacy variables included change in the scores of IIEF question 3 and 4 (IIEF Q3 and Q4) from baseline, change in all domain scores in the IIEF from baseline, Sexual Encounter Profile questions 2 and 3 (SEP2 and SEP3), the Global Assessment Question (GAQ) and the Life Satisfaction Checklist (LSC).
RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, mirodenafil group showed significantly greater change in the IIEF-EF domain score from baseline compared with the placebo group (9.3 vs. 1.4, P < 0.0001). The changes from baseline in the mirodenafil group in IIEF Q3 (1.7 vs. 0.4, P < 0.0001) and Q4 (1.7 vs. 0.3, P < 0.0001) were higher compared with the placebo group. Differences between the mirodenafil and placebo groups were significant in the SEP2 (82.0% vs. 55.2%, P = 0.0003), SEP3 (68.9% vs. 22.3%, P < 0.0001). Difference in GAQ "YES" responses was also significant (76.9% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001). Normal EF domain scores (≥ 26) at study end were achieved by 32.7% and 9.4% in the mirodeniafl and placebo groups, respectively (P = 0.0031). As for the LSC scores, the mirodenafil group showed significantly greater improvements in sexual life and partner relationship than the placebo group. Most treatment-associated AEs were mild that resolved spontaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: Mirodenafil is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of diabetic patients with ED in Korea.
© 2010 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20626604     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01888.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

Review 1.  Erectile dysfunction and diabetes: A melting pot of circumstances and treatments.

Authors:  Giuseppe Defeudis; Rossella Mazzilli; Marta Tenuta; Giovanni Rossini; Virginia Zamponi; Soraya Olana; Antongiulio Faggiano; Paolo Pozzilli; Andrea M Isidori; Daniele Gianfrilli
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 8.128

Review 2.  A review of the efficacy and safety of mirodenafil in the management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Min Chul Cho; Jae-Seung Paick
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-01-19

Review 3.  How to treat erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes: from pathophysiology to treatment.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios Hatzichristou
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Siddharth Sarkar; Rishab Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) Guideline on Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ji Kan Ryu; Kang Su Cho; Su Jin Kim; Kyung Jin Oh; Sung Chul Kam; Kyung Keun Seo; Hong Seok Shin; Soo Woong Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 6.  Mirodenafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Park; Kyung Hyun Moon; Seung Wook Lee; Won Ki Lee; Sung Chul Kam; Jun Ho Lee; Nam Cheol Park
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Mirodenafil Oro-Dispersible Film in Korean Patients with Erectile Dysfunction: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter, Phase IV Study.

Authors:  Sung Won Lee; Hwancheol Son; Seung Wook Lee; Kang Su Cho; Du Geon Moon; Dae Yul Yang; Woo Sik Chung; Jun-Kyu Suh; Hyun Jun Park; Kweonsik Min; Ki Hak Moon; Kwangsung Park; Jong Kwan Park; Jae Seog Hyun; Sang-Kuk Yang
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.400

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.