RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a three-item instrument that measures disability in three inter-related domains: work, family life/home responsibilities and social/leisure activities. The main objective of the present study was to examine the factor structure, reliability and construct validity of the SDS in a wide Spanish sample of primary care (PC) patients. METHODS: One phase cross-sectional survey. A total of 3815 patients, aged 18 years or older attending PC for a medical visit, were interviewed between October 2005 and March 2006. The interviews included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders for depressive and anxiety disorders, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for the rest of mental disorders, a medical conditions checklist, the 2.0 version of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) for measuring quality of life and the SDS. RESULTS: The principal component analysis and the subsequent confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the SDS is one-dimensional (normed fit index = 0.990, non-normed fit index = 0.987, comparative fit index = 0.991, goodness-of-fit index = 0.993, standardized root mean-square residual = 0.037, root mean-square error of approximation = 0.053). The internal consistency of the scale was good (α = 0.83) and it was significantly associated with the physical and mental component of the SF-12. Concerning discriminative validity, patients with major depression or panic disorder scored higher on the SDS than patients with chronic medical conditions or with no chronic pathology. We also found that a cut-off point of 8 in the SDS adequately discriminated between patients with and without depression (area under the curve = 0.814, sensitivity = 81.60%, specificity = 70.60%). CONCLUSIONS: The SDS seems a reliable, valid and useful clinical tool for measuring disability in Spanish PC patients.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a three-item instrument that measures disability in three inter-related domains: work, family life/home responsibilities and social/leisure activities. The main objective of the present study was to examine the factor structure, reliability and construct validity of the SDS in a wide Spanish sample of primary care (PC) patients. METHODS: One phase cross-sectional survey. A total of 3815 patients, aged 18 years or older attending PC for a medical visit, were interviewed between October 2005 and March 2006. The interviews included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders for depressive and anxiety disorders, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview for the rest of mental disorders, a medical conditions checklist, the 2.0 version of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) for measuring quality of life and the SDS. RESULTS: The principal component analysis and the subsequent confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the SDS is one-dimensional (normed fit index = 0.990, non-normed fit index = 0.987, comparative fit index = 0.991, goodness-of-fit index = 0.993, standardized root mean-square residual = 0.037, root mean-square error of approximation = 0.053). The internal consistency of the scale was good (α = 0.83) and it was significantly associated with the physical and mental component of the SF-12. Concerning discriminative validity, patients with major depression or panic disorder scored higher on the SDS than patients with chronic medical conditions or with no chronic pathology. We also found that a cut-off point of 8 in the SDS adequately discriminated between patients with and without depression (area under the curve = 0.814, sensitivity = 81.60%, specificity = 70.60%). CONCLUSIONS: The SDS seems a reliable, valid and useful clinical tool for measuring disability in Spanish PC patients.
Authors: Julia Davidoff; Scott Christensen; David N Khalili; Jaidyn Nguyen; Waguih William IsHak Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Katherine E Watkins; Allison J Ober; Karen Lamp; Mimi Lind; Claude Setodji; Karen Chan Osilla; Sarah B Hunter; Colleen M McCullough; Kirsten Becker; Praise O Iyiewuare; Allison Diamant; Keith Heinzerling; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Juan V Luciano; José L Ayuso-Mateos; Ana Fernandez; Jaume Aguado; Antoni Serrano-Blanco; Miquel Roca; Josep M Haro Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Luisa Baladón; Maria Rubio-Valera; Antoni Serrano-Blanco; Diego J Palao; Ana Fernández Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Michael J Zvolensky; Daniel J Paulus; Jafar Bakhshaie; Monica Garza; Melissa Ochoa-Perez; Chad Lemaire; Daniel Bogiaizian; Zuzuky Robles; Amelia Aldao; Anahi Collado; Carl W Lejuez; Norman B Schmidt Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2015-11-12
Authors: Allison J Ober; Katherine E Watkins; Colleen M McCullough; Claude M Setodji; Karen Osilla; Sarah B Hunter Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2018-04-28
Authors: Laura Gisbert-Gustemps; Jorge Lugo-Marín; Imanol Setien Ramos; Gemma Español Martín; Eduard Vieta; C Mar Bonnín; Josep Antoni Ramos Quiroga Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 3.630