Literature DB >> 20626450

Pattern of lymph node metastases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage system.

Y Tachimori1, Y Nagai, N Kanamori, N Hokamura, H Igaki.   

Abstract

The recent anatomical studies of the esophagus showed that submucosal longitudinal lymphatic vessels connect to the superior mediastinal and the paracardial lymphatics and lymphatic routes to periesophageal nodes originate from the muscle layer. Using clinical data for lymph node metastasis, we verify these anatomical bases to clarify the rational areas of lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery. Analysis was performed on 356 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy with three-field dissection. Patients were divided into those with tumor limited within the submucosal layer and those with tumor invading or penetrating the muscle layer. Frequency of node metastasis was compared according to supraclavicular, upper mediastinum, mid-mediastinum, lower mediastinum, perigastric and celiac areas. In patients with tumor limited to the submucosal layer, node metastasis was more frequent in the upper mediastinum and perigastric area than the mid- or lower mediastinum. Even in patients with tumor located in the lower esophagus, node metastasis was more frequent in the upper mediastinum than the mid-mediastinum or lower mediastinum. In patients with tumor located in the mid-esophagus, node metastasis was more frequent in the supraclavicular area than the mid-mediastinum or lower mediastinum. In patients with tumor invading or penetrating the muscle layer, node metastasis in the mid- and lower mediastinum increased dramatically, but was still less frequent than those in the upper mediastinum or the perigastric area. Postoperative survival curves did not differ among the involved areas. The most predictive factor associated with lymph node metastasis for postoperative survival was not the area of involved nodes, but the number of involved nodes by multivariate analyses. These clinical results verify recent anatomical observations. The lack of difference in survival rates among the involved areas suggests that these areas should be staged equivalently. For adequate nodal staging, the upper mediastinum should be dissected for the lower esophageal tumor and supraclavicular areas should be dissected for the mid-esophageal tumor even in patients with tumor limited to within the submucosal layer.
© 2010 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20626450     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01086.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  38 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis rate for patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer and its implication in delineation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy.

Authors:  X Ding; J Zhang; B Li; Z Wang; W Huang; T Zhou; Y Wei; H Li
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Computed tomography-based distribution of involved lymph nodes in patients with upper esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M Li; Y Liu; L Xu; Y Huang; W Li; J Yu; L Kong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Curative resection of esophageal cancer with a double aortic arch.

Authors:  Norihisa Uemura; Tetsuya Abe; Ryosuke Kawai; Seiji Ito; Koji Komori; Yoshiki Senda; Kazunari Misawa; Yuichi Ito; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Masayuki Shinoda
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-31

4.  Impact of routine recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in prone esophagectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Makoto Hikage; Takashi Kamei; Toru Nakano; Shigeo Abe; Kazunori Katsura; Yusuke Taniyama; Tadashi Sakurai; Jin Teshima; Soichi Ito; Nobuchika Niizuma; Hiroshi Okamoto; Toshiaki Fukutomi; Masato Yamada; Shota Maruyama; Noriaki Ohuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Three-field lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Satoru Matsuda; Hiroya Takeuchi; Hirofumi Kawakubo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: incidence, management, and impact on short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Martijn G Scholtemeijer; Maarten F J Seesing; Hylke J F Brenkman; Luuk M Janssen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized.

Authors:  Eliza R C Hagens; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Miguel A Cuesta; Suzanne S Gisbertz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Pattern of lymph node metastases of squamous cell esophageal cancer based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage system: efficacy of lymph node dissection according to tumor location.

Authors:  Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Feasibility of a robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Dae Joon Kim; Seong Yong Park; Seokki Lee; Hyoung-Il Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.