BACKGROUND: STEALTH(®) liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), a camptothecin analog, is eliminated by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), which consists of cells, including monocytes. We evaluated the relationship between monocyte and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) in the blood and pharmacokinetic disposition of S-CKD602 and nonliposomal CKD-602 (NL-CKD602) in patients. METHODS: As part of a phase I study of S-CKD602 and phase I and II studies of NL-CKD602, the percent decreases in ANC and monocytes at their nadir were calculated. After S-CKD602, the amount of CKD-602 recovered in urine was measured. RESULTS: For S-CKD602 in patients <60 years, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 43 ± 31 and 58 ± 26%, respectively (P = 0.001). For S-CKD602 in patients ≥60, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 41 ± 31 and 45 ± 36%, respectively (P = 0.50). For NL-CKD602 (n = 42), the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were similar (P > 0.05). For S-CKD602, the relationship between the percent decrease in monocytes and CKD-602 recovered in urine was stronger in patients <60 (R(2) = 0.82), compared with patients ≥60 (R(2) = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Monocytes are more sensitive to S-CKD602, compared with neutrophils, and the increased sensitivity is related to the liposomal formulation, not CKD-602. These results suggest that monocytes engulf S-CKD602, which causes the release of CKD-602 from the liposome and toxicity to the monocytes, and that the effects are more prominent in patients <60.
BACKGROUND: STEALTH(®) liposomal CKD-602 (S-CKD602), a camptothecin analog, is eliminated by the reticuloendothelial system (RES), which consists of cells, including monocytes. We evaluated the relationship between monocyte and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) in the blood and pharmacokinetic disposition of S-CKD602 and nonliposomal CKD-602 (NL-CKD602) in patients. METHODS: As part of a phase I study of S-CKD602 and phase I and II studies of NL-CKD602, the percent decreases in ANC and monocytes at their nadir were calculated. After S-CKD602, the amount of CKD-602 recovered in urine was measured. RESULTS: For S-CKD602 in patients <60 years, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 43 ± 31 and 58 ± 26%, respectively (P = 0.001). For S-CKD602 in patients ≥60, the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were 41 ± 31 and 45 ± 36%, respectively (P = 0.50). For NL-CKD602 (n = 42), the percent decrease in ANC and monocytes were similar (P > 0.05). For S-CKD602, the relationship between the percent decrease in monocytes and CKD-602 recovered in urine was stronger in patients <60 (R(2) = 0.82), compared with patients ≥60 (R(2) = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Monocytes are more sensitive to S-CKD602, compared with neutrophils, and the increased sensitivity is related to the liposomal formulation, not CKD-602. These results suggest that monocytes engulf S-CKD602, which causes the release of CKD-602 from the liposome and toxicity to the monocytes, and that the effects are more prominent in patients <60.
Authors: William C Zamboni; Vladimir Torchilin; Anil K Patri; Jeff Hrkach; Stephen Stern; Robert Lee; Andre Nel; Nicholas J Panaro; Piotr Grodzinski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Whitney P Caron; Harvey Clewell; Robert Dedrick; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Whitney L Davis; Ning Yu; Margaret Tonda; Jan H Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; William C Zamboni Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Gina Song; David B Darr; Charlene M Santos; Mark Ross; Alain Valdivia; Jamie L Jordan; Bentley R Midkiff; Stephanie Cohen; Nana Nikolaishvili-Feinberg; C Ryan Miller; Teresa K Tarrant; Arlin B Rogers; Andrew C Dudley; Charles M Perou; William C Zamboni Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeremy A Bartlett; Marcus Brewster; Paul Brown; Donna Cabral-Lilly; Celia N Cruz; Raymond David; W Mark Eickhoff; Sabine Haubenreisser; Abigail Jacobs; Frank Malinoski; Elaine Morefield; Ritu Nalubola; Robert K Prud'homme; Nakissa Sadrieh; Christie M Sayes; Hripsime Shahbazian; Nanda Subbarao; Lawrence Tamarkin; Katherine Tyner; Rajendra Uppoor; Margaret Whittaker-Caulk; William Zamboni Journal: AAPS J Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Jamie L Betker; Dallas Jones; Christine R Childs; Karen M Helm; Kristina Terrell; Maria A Nagel; Thomas J Anchordoquy Journal: J Control Release Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Whitney P Caron; John C Lay; Alan M Fong; Ninh M La-Beck; Parag Kumar; Suzanne E Newman; Haibo Zhou; Jane H Monaco; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Wendy R Brewster; Linda Van Le; Victoria L Bae-Jump; Paola A Gehrig; William C Zamboni Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 4.030