Literature DB >> 20626303

Outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors accompanied by fibrosis.

Aki Matsumoto1, Shinji Tanaka, Sayaka Oba, Hiroyuki Kanao, Shiro Oka, Masaharu Yoshihara, Kazuaki Chayama.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a difficult procedure. We aimed to retrospectively assess the relationship between the outcome of ESD for colorectal tumors and the degree of fibrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 203 consecutive patients with colorectal tumors larger than 20 mm in diameter who had undergone ESD at our hospital from November 2002 to June 2009. During ESD, the degree of submucosal fibrosis was classified into three types (F0-2). The relationship between the degree of fibrosis and the lesion characteristics and those between the outcome of ESD and the degree of fibrosis were analyzed.
RESULTS: In the cases of granular laterally spreading tumors, the incidence of F2 fibrosis in nodular mixed-type tumors was significantly higher than that in homogenous-type tumors. An increase in the experience of the operators caused significant improvements in the rates of complete en bloc resection (p = 0.022) and perforation (p = 0.03) in the cases of lesions with F0-1 fibrosis. By contrast, operator experience did not cause any significant improvements in the rates of complete en bloc resection and perforation in the cases of lesions with F2 fibrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Experienced operators could safely perform complete en bloc resection in the cases of lesions with F0-1 fibrosis. However, in the cases of lesions with F2 fibrosis, the rate of complete en bloc resection was low and the perforation rate was high even when ESD was performed by an experienced operator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20626303     DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2010.495416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  76 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Past, Present, and Factors Impacting Future Dissemination.

Authors:  Jason Ferreira; Paul Akerman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

3.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yuki Ninomiya; Yuzuru Tamaru; Kenjiro Shigita; Nana Hayashi; Hiroyuki Egi; Takao Hinoi; Hideki Ohdan; Koji Arihiro; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Importance of histological evaluation in endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Nobuaki Yagi; Akio Yanagisawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-04-15

5.  Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Koichiro Sato; Sayo Ito; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Mitsuru Kato; Kenji Tominaga; Takeshi Suzuki; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroyasu Iishi; Shin-ei Kudo; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Masahiro Igarashi; Yusuke Saitoh; Yuji Inoue; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Takashi Hisabe; Osamu Tsuruta; Yasushi Sano; Hiroo Yamano; Seiji Shimizu; Naohisa Yahagi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisashi Nakamura; Takahiro Fujii; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort.

Authors:  Yoji Takeuchi; Hiroyasu Iishi; Shinji Tanaka; Yutaka Saito; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Shin-Ei Kudo; Yasushi Sano; Takashi Hisabe; Naohisa Yahagi; Yusuke Saitoh; Masahiro Igarashi; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Hiroo Yamano; Seiji Shimizu; Osamu Tsuruta; Yuji Inoue; Toshiaki Watanabe; Hisashi Nakamura; Takahiro Fujii; Noriya Uedo; Toshio Shimokawa; Hideki Ishikawa; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Factors Associated with Fibrosis during Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Does Pretreatment Biopsy Potentially Elicit Submucosal Fibrosis and Affect Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes?

Authors:  Masatake Kuroha; Hisashi Shiga; Yoshitake Kanazawa; Hiroshi Nagai; Tomoyuki Handa; Ryo Ichikawa; Motoyuki Onodera; Takeo Naito; Rintaro Moroi; Tomoya Kimura; Katsuya Endo; Yoichi Kakuta; Yoshitaka Kinouchi; Tooru Shimosegawa; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Dual Red Imaging Maintains Clear Visibility During Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Kenta Matsumoto; Kazuki Boda; Ken Yamashita; Daiki Hirano; Kyoku Sumimoto; Yuzuru Tamaru; Yuki Ninomiya; Nana Hayashi; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Risk factors for vertical incomplete resection in endoscopic submucosal dissection as total excisional biopsy for submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Shun-ichiro Ozawa; Shinji Tanaka; Nana Hayashi; Soki Nishiyama; Motomi Terasaki; Koichi Nakadoi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Shiro Oka; Shigeto Yoshida; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.