Literature DB >> 20626083

Evaluation of posttransplant methotrexate to facilitate engraftment in the canine major histocompatibility complex-haploidentical nonmyeloablative transplant model.

Monica S Thakar1, Erlinda B Santos, Theodore A Gooley, George Sale, Rainer Storb, Hans-Peter Kiem, Brenda M Sandmaier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant cyclophosphamide has been shown to control graft-versus-host disease and facilitate engraftment in the major histocompatibility complex-haploidentical transplant setting. Here, we hypothesized that methotrexate (MTX) could be used in a similar fashion. In patients with genetic diseases, the use of MTX rather than an alkylating agent such as cyclophosphamide would be preferable due to its reduced risk of promoting secondary malignancies.
METHOD: Using our standard conditioning regimen consisting of a specific anti-CD44 mAb (S5) and 200 cGy total body irradiation followed by postgrafting immunosuppression with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil as a control group, we compared outcomes with experimental animals receiving the same regimen with the addition of a single, large dose of posttransplant MTX on day +3 (50-400 mg/m2).
RESULTS: Adding MTX at all dose levels did not abrogate initial engraftment and controlled graft-versus-host disease in most cases. Dogs receiving MTX at the first dose level (50 mg/m2) improved time to rejection compared with controls (P=0.03) but did not decrease overall rates of rejection (P=0.56). However, increasing the dose of MTX beyond 50 mg/m2 seemed to have detrimental effects in both average (P=0.04) and peak (P=0.002) donor chimerism. Increasing the dose of MTX also promoted more profound lymphopenia. Finally, delaying cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil until after MTX administration did not seem to significantly improve engraftment kinetics.
CONCLUSION: Adding high-dose MTX seemed to benefit the duration of donor chimerism at the lowest dose studied, but there was no benefit when escalating MTX doses to toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20626083      PMCID: PMC2921965          DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181e0a0c4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  28 in total

1.  Nucleotide sequence and polymorphism analysis of canine DRA cDNA clones.

Authors:  J L Wagner; S A DeRose; R C Burnett; R Storb
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  1995-04

2.  Enhancement of natural killer activity by an antibody to CD44.

Authors:  P H Tan; E B Santos; H C Rossbach; B M Sandmaier
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  The use of an anti-TCRalphabeta monoclonal antibody to control host-versus-graft reactions in canine marrow allograft recipients conditioned with low dose total body irradiation.

Authors:  A A Barsoukov; P F Moore; R Storb; E B Santos; B M Sandmaier
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-05-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Characterization of monoclonal antibodies that recognize canine CD34.

Authors:  P A McSweeney; K A Rouleau; P M Wallace; B Bruno; R G Andrews; L Krizanac-Bengez; B M Sandmaier; R Storb; E Wayner; R A Nash
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Dog leukocyte antigen-haploidentical stem cell allografts after anti-CD44 therapy and nonmyeloablative conditioning in a preclinical canine model.

Authors:  Takahiro Fukuda; Fabio R Kerbauy; Theodore Gooley; Erlinda B Santos; Rainer Storb; Brenda M Sandmaier
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  DLA-DRB1 and DLA-DQB1 histocompatibility typing by PCR-SSCP and sequencing.

Authors:  J L Wagner; J D Works; R Storb
Journal:  Tissue Antigens       Date:  1998-10

7.  Histocompatibility testing of dog families with highly polymorphic microsatellite markers.

Authors:  J L Wagner; R C Burnett; S A DeRose; L V Francisco; R Storb; E A Ostrander
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Leo Luznik; Paul V O'Donnell; Heather J Symons; Allen R Chen; M Susan Leffell; Marianna Zahurak; Ted A Gooley; Steve Piantadosi; Michele Kaup; Richard F Ambinder; Carol Ann Huff; William Matsui; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Ivan Borrello; Jonathan D Powell; Elizabeth Harrington; Sandy Warnock; Mary Flowers; Robert A Brodsky; Brenda M Sandmaier; Rainer F Storb; Richard J Jones; Ephraim J Fuchs
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Allogeneic transplant of canine peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by recombinant canine hematopoietic growth factors.

Authors:  B M Sandmaier; R Storb; E B Santos; L Krizanac-Bengez; T Lian; P A McSweeney; C Yu; F G Schuening; H J Deeg; T Graham
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Assessment of aldehyde dehydrogenase in viable cells.

Authors:  R J Jones; J P Barber; M S Vala; M I Collector; S H Kaufmann; S M Ludeman; O M Colvin; J Hilton
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Developments and translational relevance for the canine haematopoietic cell transplantation preclinical model.

Authors:  Scott S Graves; Rainer Storb
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.385

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.