Literature DB >> 20625818

Gene expression analysis reveals a different transcriptomic landscape in female and male breast cancer.

Maurizio Callari1, Vera Cappelletti, Loris De Cecco, Valeria Musella, Patrizia Miodini, Silvia Veneroni, Manuela Gariboldi, Marco Alessandro Pierotti, Maria Grazia Daidone.   

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a poorly characterized disease because of its rarity. Clinical management is based on results obtained from randomized trials conducted in women notwithstanding data in the literature suggesting relevant gender-associated differences in terms of biological and clinical behavior. However, a genome-wide characterization of MBC on a transcriptional level is lacking. In this study, gene expression profiles of 37 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) MBC specimens were compared to that of 53 ER+ Female Breast Cancer (FBC) samples similar for clinical and patho-biological features. Almost 1000 genes were found differentially expressed (FDR < 1%) between female and male patients and biological interpretation highlighted a gender-associated modulation of key biological processes ranging from energy metabolism to regulation of translation and matrix remodeling as well as immune system recruitment. Moreover, an analysis of genes correlated to steroid receptors and ERBB2 suggested a prominent role for the androgen receptor in MBC with a minor relevance for progesterone receptor and ERBB2, although, similarly to FBC, a genomic amplification could be observed. Our findings support the idea that breast cancer is a quite different disease in male and female patients and the underlying gender-related biological differences are likely to have clinical implications connected with different susceptibility to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625818     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1015-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  32 in total

1.  The 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Monica Gonzalez-Loperena; Edi Brogi; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Hannah Y Wen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The molecular genetic make-up of male breast cancer.

Authors:  Cathy B Moelans; Joep de Ligt; Petra van der Groep; Pjotr Prins; Nicolle J M Besselink; Marlous Hoogstraat; Natalie D Ter Hoeve; Miangela M Lacle; Robert Kornegoor; Carmen C van der Pol; Wendy W J de Leng; Ellis Barbé; Bert van der Vegt; John Martens; Peter Bult; Vincent T H B M Smit; Marco J Koudijs; Isaac J Nijman; Emile E Voest; Pier Selenica; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Elsken van der Wall; Edwin Cuppen; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  X chromosome gain is related to increased androgen receptor expression in male breast cancer.

Authors:  Enrico Di Oto; Giovanni B Biserni; Zsuzsanna Varga; Luca Morandi; Maria C Cucchi; Riccardo Masetti; Maria P Foschini
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Male breast cancer: a rare disease that might uncover underlying pathways of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Ottini
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Male breast cancer: an update.

Authors:  Stephen Fox; Valerie Speirs; Abeer M Shaaban
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  An international comparison of male and female breast cancer incidence rates.

Authors:  Diana Ly; David Forman; Jacques Ferlay; Louise A Brinton; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  A targeted genotyping approach to enhance the identification of variants for lactation persistency in dairy cows.

Authors:  Duy Ngoc Do; Nathalie Bissonnette; Pierre Lacasse; Filippo Miglior; Xin Zhao; Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Male breast cancer: correlation between immunohistochemical subtyping and PAM50 intrinsic subtypes, and the subsequent clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz; Luis Vicioso; Angela Santonja; Martina Álvarez; Yéssica Plata-Fernández; José Miramón; Irene Zarcos; César L Ramírez-Tortosa; Julio Montes-Torres; José M Jerez; Vanessa de Luque; Casilda Llácer; Cristina E Fernández-De Sousa; Lidia Pérez-Villa; Emilio Alba
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Survival Comparisons Between Early Male and Female Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Qiu-Juan Wang; Yong-Fu Xiong; Yang Shi; Wen-Jing Yang; Xiang Zhang; Hong-Yuan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Poor prognosis of male triple-positive breast Cancer patients: a propensity score matched SEER analysis and molecular portraits.

Authors:  Biyuan Wang; Hui Wang; Andi Zhao; Mi Zhang; Jin Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.