Literature DB >> 20625816

Pathological complete response after preoperative systemic therapy and outcome: relevance of clinical and biologic baseline features.

Emilia Montagna1, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Nicole Rotmensz, Giuseppe Viale, Giancarlo Pruneri, Paolo Veronesi, Giuseppe Cancello, Alessandra Balduzzi, Silvia Dellapasqua, Anna Cardillo, Alberto Luini, Stefano Zurrida, Oreste Gentilini, Mauro Giuseppe Mastropasqua, Luca Bottiglieri, Monica Iorfida, Aron Goldhirsch, Marco Colleoni.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the outcome of patients with breast cancer according to response after primary therapy and according to clinical and biologic baseline features, we identified patients who were treated with preoperative therapy and who underwent surgery at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy, between 1995 and 2006. The outcome of patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) and patients with residual disease (RD) at final surgery was analyzed. Of the 687 patients treated with preoperative therapy, we identified 82 patients who achieved pCR (12%) and 605 patients with RD (88%). A statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) was observed for patients with pCR compared with those who had RD (5 year DFS 73% vs. 59% P = 0.029; 5 year DDFS 81% vs. 72% P = 0.085; 5 year OS 88% vs. 77% P = 0.033). At the multivariate analysis, for patients achieving pCR, large tumor size (> 5 cm) correlated with worse DFS (HR 3.18; 95% CI 1.34-7.51); clinical nodal involvement was associated with poorer DFS and DDFS (HR 6.94; 95% CI 1.62-29.73 and HR 9.87 95% CI 1.29-75.53, respectively). pCR after preoperative systemic therapy correlated with significant improved outcome. A substantial rate of relapse was observed for patients with large tumors and with clinical nodal involvement at baseline. Further improvement in adjuvant treatment might be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625816     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1027-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  27 in total

1.  Efficacy of vinorelbine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hui Gao; Qiuyun Li; Wei Wei; Y I Jiang; Huawei Yang; Jianlun Liu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-09

2.  Different methods of pretreatment Ki-67 labeling index evaluation in core biopsies of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to response to therapy.

Authors:  András Vörös; Erika Csörgő; Bence Kővári; Péter Lázár; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Orsolya Rusz; Tibor Nyári; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Pathological complete response in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: The natural history of an elusive prognosticator.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Iheoma Nwaogu; Donna B Jeffe; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-31

4.  Association between HER2 status and response to neoadjuvant anthracycline followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy without trastuzumab in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lu Yao; Juan Zhang; Yiqiang Liu; Tao Ouyang; Jinfeng Li; Tianfeng Wang; Zhaoqing Fan; Tie Fan; Benyao Lin; Yuntao Xie
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  FDG-PET/CT and MRI for Evaluation of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Sara Sheikhbahaei; Tyler J Trahan; Jennifer Xiao; Mehdi Taghipour; Esther Mena; Roisin M Connolly; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-08

6.  Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yun Ju Kim; Sung Hun Kim; Ah Won Lee; Min-Sun Jin; Bong Joo Kang; Byung Joo Song
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Increased efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Bohuslav Melichar; Helena Hornychová; Hana Kalábová; Hana Bašová; Jindřiška Mergancová; Hana Urminská; Pavel Jandík; Vladimír Cervinka; Jan Laco; Aleš Ryška
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Response prediction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison between pre-therapeutic gene expression profiles and in vitro chemosensitivity assay.

Authors:  Christian F Singer; Florian Klinglmüller; Rembert Stratmann; Christine Staudigl; Anneliese Fink-Retter; Daphne Gschwantler; Samir Helmy; Georg Pfeiler; Anne Catharina Dressler; Christian Sartori; Martin Bilban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of Doxorubicin plus docetaxel neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Doxorubicin plus vinorelbine in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Geumhee Gwak; Ji-Young Kim; Keongmee Park; Young Joo Shin; Hyunjin Cho; Sung Jin Park; Geun Ho Yang; Byung Noe Bae; Ki Whan Kim; Sehwan Han
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Current operative management of breast cancer: an age of smaller resections and bigger cures.

Authors:  Jack W Rostas; Donna Lynn Dyess
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.