INTRODUCTION: This study determines the extent of, and factors associated with, delayed discharges for stroke patients from inpatient rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study utilising medical notes review was conducted at an inpatient rehabilitation centre in Singapore. Acute stroke patients (n = 487) admitted between March 2005 and December 2006 were studied. The primary measure was delayed discharge defined as an extension in inpatient stay beyond the planned duration. Factors associated with delays in discharge were categorised as individual, caregiver, medical and organisational. RESULTS: There were a total of 172 delayed discharges (35.6%). The mean [standard deviation (SD)] length of stay was 40.5 days (SD, 19.5 days) and 25.8 days (SD, 11.4 days) for patients with delayed and prompt discharges, respectively. Mean extension of stay was 9.7 days (SD, 13.8 days). Caregiver-related reasons were cited for 79.7% of the delays whereas organisational factors (awaiting nursing home placement, investigations or specialist appointments) accounted for 17.4%. Four factors were found to be independently associated with delayed discharge: discharge to the care of foreign domestic helper, nursing home placement, lower admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score and discharge planning process. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that caregiver and organisational factors were main contributors of delayed discharge. Targeted caregiver training and the provision of post-discharge support may improve the confidence of caregivers of patients with greater motor disability. The use of structured discharge planning programmes may improve the efficiency of the rehabilitation service. To reduce delays, problems with the supply of formal and informal post-discharge care must also be addressed.
INTRODUCTION: This study determines the extent of, and factors associated with, delayed discharges for strokepatients from inpatient rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study utilising medical notes review was conducted at an inpatient rehabilitation centre in Singapore. Acute strokepatients (n = 487) admitted between March 2005 and December 2006 were studied. The primary measure was delayed discharge defined as an extension in inpatient stay beyond the planned duration. Factors associated with delays in discharge were categorised as individual, caregiver, medical and organisational. RESULTS: There were a total of 172 delayed discharges (35.6%). The mean [standard deviation (SD)] length of stay was 40.5 days (SD, 19.5 days) and 25.8 days (SD, 11.4 days) for patients with delayed and prompt discharges, respectively. Mean extension of stay was 9.7 days (SD, 13.8 days). Caregiver-related reasons were cited for 79.7% of the delays whereas organisational factors (awaiting nursing home placement, investigations or specialist appointments) accounted for 17.4%. Four factors were found to be independently associated with delayed discharge: discharge to the care of foreign domestic helper, nursing home placement, lower admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score and discharge planning process. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that caregiver and organisational factors were main contributors of delayed discharge. Targeted caregiver training and the provision of post-discharge support may improve the confidence of caregivers of patients with greater motor disability. The use of structured discharge planning programmes may improve the efficiency of the rehabilitation service. To reduce delays, problems with the supply of formal and informal post-discharge care must also be addressed.
Authors: Amada Pellico-López; Ana Fernández-Feito; David Cantarero; Manuel Herrero-Montes; Joaquín Cayón-de Las Cuevas; Paula Parás-Bravo; María Paz-Zulueta Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Chunzhen Tan; Yee Sien Ng; Gerald C H Koh; Deidre A De Silva; Arul Earnest; Sylvaine Barbier Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Zakkoyya H Lewis; Catherine Cooper Hay; James E Graham; Yu-Li Lin; Amol M Karmarkar; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Kerry Kuluski; Julia W Ho; Lauren Cadel; Sara Shearkhani; Charissa Levy; Michelle Marcinow; Allie Peckham; Jane Sandercock; Donald J Willison; Sara Jt Guilcher Journal: Health Expect Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Amada Pellico-López; David Cantarero; Ana Fernández-Feito; Paula Parás-Bravo; Joaquín Cayón de Las Cuevas; María Paz-Zulueta Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Shilpa Tyagi; Gerald Choon-Huat Koh; Nan Luo; Kelvin Bryan Tan; Helen Hoenig; David Bruce Matchar; Joanne Yoong; Angelique Chan; Kim En Lee; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Edward Menon; Kin Ming Chan; Deidre Anne De Silva; Philip Yap; Boon Yeow Tan; Effie Chew; Sherry H Young; Yee Sien Ng; Tian Ming Tu; Yan Hoon Ang; Keng He Kong; Rajinder Singh; Reshma A Merchant; Hui Meng Chang; Tseng Tsai Yeo; Chou Ning; Angela Cheong; Chuen Seng Tan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 2.692