Literature DB >> 20625124

Prognostic impact of minimal residual disease in CBFB-MYH11-positive acute myeloid leukemia.

Andrea Corbacioglu1, Claudia Scholl, Richard F Schlenk, Karina Eiwen, Juan Du, Lars Bullinger, Stefan Fröhling, Peter Reimer, Mathias Rummel, Hans-Günter Derigs, David Nachbaur, Jürgen Krauter, Arnold Ganser, Hartmut Döhner, Konstanze Döhner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) expressing the CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on 684 bone marrow (BM; n = 331) and/or peripheral blood (PB; n = 353) samples (median, 13 samples per patient) from 53 younger adult (16 to 60 years old) patients with AML treated in prospective German-Austrian AML Study Group treatment trials. Samples were obtained at diagnosis (BM, n = 45; PB, n = 48), during treatment course (BM, n = 153; PB, n = 122), and at follow-up (BM, n = 133; PB, n = 183). To evaluate the applicability of PB for MRD detection, 198 paired BM and PB samples obtained at identical time points were analyzed.
RESULTS: The following three clinically relevant checkpoints were identified during consolidation and early follow-up that predicted relapse: achievement of PCR negativity in at least one BM sample during consolidation therapy (2-year relapse-free survival [RFS], 79% v 54% for PCR positivity; P = .035); achievement of PCR negativity in at least two BM or PB samples during consolidation therapy and early follow-up (< or = 3 months; 2-year RFS, P = .001; overall survival, P = .01); and conversion from PCR negativity to PCR positivity with copy ratios of more than 10 after consolidation therapy. Analysis of paired BM and PB samples revealed BM samples to be more sensitive during the course of therapy, whereas for follow-up, PB samples were equally informative.
CONCLUSION: We defined clinically relevant MRD checkpoints that allow for the identification of patients with CBFB-MYH11-positive AML who are at high risk of relapse. Monitoring of CBFB-MYH11 transcript levels should be incorporated into future clinical trials to guide therapeutic decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625124     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.6468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  37 in total

1.  Redefining transplant in acute leukemia.

Authors:  Rob Sellar; Anthony H Goldstone; Hillard M Lazarus
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Great expectations in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maliha Khan; Courtney D DiNardo
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Minimal residual disease detection in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: does flow cytometry score a point over molecular biology?

Authors:  Adriano Venditti; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Luca Maurillo; Francesco Buccisano; Sergio Amadori
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2013-01

4.  Activating internal tandem duplication mutations of the fms-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3-ITD) at complete response and relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Jorge Cortes; Stefan Faderl; Sherry Pierce; Naval Daver; Tapan Kadia; Gautam Borthakur; Raja Luthra; Hagop Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Prognosis of patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia after first relapse.

Authors:  Saiko Kurosawa; Shuichi Miyawaki; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Heiwa Kanamori; Toru Sakura; Yukiyoshi Moriuchi; Fumiaki Sano; Takeshi Kobayashi; Atsushi Yasumoto; Kazuo Hatanaka; Masamitsu Yanada; Yuichiro Nawa; Jin Takeuchi; Yukinori Nakamura; Shin Fujisawa; Hirohiko Shibayama; Ikuo Miura; Takahiro Fukuda
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Comparison of spatial chromosomal organization between bone marrow and peripheral blood in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Xueli Tian; Yanfang Wang; Yu Liu; Jun Yin; Dieyan Chen; Xiaoyan Ke; Wanyun Ma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Richard F Schlenk
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  DNMT3A mutant transcript levels persist in remission and do not predict outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  V I Gaidzik; D Weber; P Paschka; A Kaumanns; S Krieger; A Corbacioglu; J Krönke; S Kapp-Schwoerer; D Krämer; H-A Horst; I Schmidt-Wolf; G Held; A Kündgen; M Ringhoffer; K Götze; T Kindler; W Fiedler; M Wattad; R F Schlenk; L Bullinger; V Teleanu; B Schlegelberger; F Thol; M Heuser; A Ganser; H Döhner; K Döhner
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 9.  Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia--current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Sabine Kayser; Roland B Walter; Wendy Stock; Richard F Schlenk
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.952

10.  Universal monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elaine Coustan-Smith; Guangchun Song; Sheila Shurtleff; Allen Eng-Juh Yeoh; Wee Joo Chng; Siew Peng Chen; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Ching-Hon Pui; James R Downing; Dario Campana
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2018-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.