Literature DB >> 20624180

The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals.

Laura Sullivan-Beckers1, Reginald B Cocroft.   

Abstract

Selection on advertisement signals arises from interacting sources including female choice, male-male competition, and the communication channel (i.e., the signaling environment). To identify the contribution of individual sources of selection, we used previously quantified relationships between signal traits and each putative source to predict relationships between signal variation and fitness in Enchenopa binotata treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae). We then measured phenotypic selection on signals and compared predicted and realized relationships between signal traits and mating success. We recorded male signals, then measured lifetime mating success at two population densities in a realistic environment in which sources of selection could interact. We identified which sources best predicted the relationship between signal variation and mating success using a multiple regression approach. All signal traits were under selection in at least one of the two breeding seasons measured, and in some cases selection was variable between years. Female preference was the strongest source of selection shaping male signals. The E. binotata species complex is a model of ecological speciation initiated by host shifts. Signal and preference divergence contribute to behavioral isolation within the complex, and the finding that female mate preferences drive signal evolution suggests that speciation in this group results from both ecological divergence and sexual selection.
© 2010 The Author(s). Evolution© 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20624180     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01073.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.

Authors:  Darren Rebar; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The relationship between a combinatorial processing rule and a continuous mate preference function in an insect.

Authors:  Camille Desjonquères; Rebecca R Holt; Bretta Speck; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Rafael L Rodríguez; Nooria Al-Wathiqui
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.

Authors:  Rafael L Rodríguez; Janette W Boughman; David A Gray; Eileen A Hebets; Gerlinde Höbel; Laurel B Symes
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Female mate choice of male signals is unlikely to promote ecological adaptation in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Joseph T Kilmer; Daniel C Cruz; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Extreme Duty Cycles in the Acoustic Signals of Tiger Moths: Sexual and Natural Selection Operating in Parallel.

Authors:  Y Fernández; N J Dowdy; W E Conner
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-01-05

7.  Asymmetric reinforcement in Lucania killifish: assessing reproductive isolation when both sexes choose.

Authors:  Michelle E St John; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Variation in signal-preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Joseph T Kilmer; Allysa C Hallett; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.624

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.