Literature DB >> 20623991

Therapeutic approaches to multiple sclerosis: an update on failed, interrupted, or inconclusive trials of immunomodulatory treatment strategies.

Jochen C Ulzheimer1, Sven G Meuth, Stefan Bittner, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Bernd C Kieseier, Heinz Wiendl.   

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) continues to be a therapeutic challenge, and much effort is being made to develop new and more effective immune therapies. Particularly in the past decade, neuroimmunologic research has delivered new and highly effective therapeutic options, as seen in the growing number of immunotherapeutic agents and biologics in development. However, numerous promising clinical trials have failed to show efficacy or have had to be halted prematurely because of unexpected adverse events. Some others have shown results that are of unknown significance with regard to a reliable assessment of true efficacy versus safety. For example, studies of the highly innovative monoclonal antibodies that selectively target immunologic effector molecules have not only revealed the impressive efficacy of such treatments, they have also raised serious concerns about the safety profiles of these antibodies. These results add a new dimension to the estimation of risk-benefit ratios regarding acute or long-term adverse effects. Therapeutic approaches that have previously failed in MS have indicated that there are discrepancies between theoretical expectations and practical outcomes of different compounds. Learning from these defeats helps to optimize future study designs and to reduce the risks to patients. This review summarizes trials on MS treatments since 2001 that failed or were interrupted, attempts to analyze the underlying reasons for failure, and discusses the implications for our current view of MS pathogenesis, clinical practice, and design of future studies. In order to maintain clarity, this review focuses on anti-inflammatory therapies and does not include studies on already approved and effective disease-modifying therapies, albeit used in distinct administration routes or under different paradigms. Neuroprotective and alternative treatment strategies are presented elsewhere.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20623991     DOI: 10.2165/11537160-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BioDrugs        ISSN: 1173-8804            Impact factor:   5.807


  10 in total

Review 1.  Neuroimmunotherapies Targeting T Cells: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Stefan Bittner; Heinz Wiendl
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?

Authors:  Julia Krämer; Heinz Wiendl
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.088

3.  Oligodendrocytes engineered with migratory proteins as effective graft source for cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Ike de la Pena; Mibel Pabon; Sandra Acosta; Paul R Sanberg; Naoki Tajiri; Yuji Kaneko; Cesar V Borlongan
Journal:  Cell Med       Date:  2014-04-10

4.  The immunomodulator AS101 suppresses production of inflammatory cytokines and ameliorates the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Li Xie; Jing Chen; Anthony McMickle; Nadia Awar; Soad Nady; Benjamin Sredni; Paul D Drew; Shiguang Yu
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 5.  Failed, Interrupted, or Inconclusive Trials on Neuroprotective and Neuroregenerative Treatment Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: Update 2015-2020.

Authors:  Niklas Huntemann; Leoni Rolfes; Marc Pawlitzki; Tobias Ruck; Steffen Pfeuffer; Heinz Wiendl; Sven G Meuth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Heinz Wiendl; Sven G Meuth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Estrogen receptor-β ligand treatment after disease onset is neuroprotective in the multiple sclerosis model.

Authors:  Amy J Wisdom; Yuan Cao; Noriko Itoh; Rory D Spence; Rhonda R Voskuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 suppresses TLR8 expression and TLR8-mediated inflammatory responses in monocytes in vitro and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in vivo.

Authors:  Bo Li; David J Baylink; Chandra Deb; Claudia Zannetti; Fatima Rajaallah; Weirong Xing; Michael H Walter; K-H William Lau; Xuezhong Qin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Biological characteristics of transcription factor RelB in different immune cell types: implications for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Meng-Ge Yang; Li Sun; Jinming Han; Chao Zheng; Hudong Liang; Jie Zhu; Tao Jin
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.041

Review 10.  Failed, Interrupted, or Inconclusive Trials on Immunomodulatory Treatment Strategies in Multiple Sclerosis: Update 2015-2020.

Authors:  Leoni Rolfes; Marc Pawlitzki; Steffen Pfeuffer; Niklas Huntemann; Heinz Wiendl; Tobias Ruck; Sven G Meuth
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.807

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.