Literature DB >> 20623647

Optimizing energy functions for protein-protein interface design.

Oz Sharabi1, Chen Yanover, Ayelet Dekel, Julia M Shifman.   

Abstract

Protein design methods have been originally developed for the design of monomeric proteins. When applied to the more challenging task of protein–protein complex design, these methods yield suboptimal results. In particular, they often fail to recapitulate favorable hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions across the interface. In this work, we aim to improve the energy function of the protein design program ORBIT to better account for binding interactions between proteins. By using the advanced machine learning framework of conditional random fields, we optimize the relative importance of all the terms in the energy function, attempting to reproduce the native side-chain conformations in protein–protein interfaces. We evaluate the performance of several optimized energy functions, each describes the van der Waals interactions using a different potential. In comparison with the original energy function, our best energy function (a) incorporates a much “softer” repulsive van der Waals potential, suitable for the discrete rotameric representation of amino acid side chains; (b) does not penalize burial of polar atoms, reflecting the frequent occurrence of polar buried residues in protein–protein interfaces; and (c) significantly up-weights the electrostatic term, attesting to the high importance of these interactions for protein–protein complex formation. Using this energy function considerably improves side chain placement accuracy for interface residues in a large test set of protein–protein complexes. Moreover, the optimized energy function recovers the native sequences of protein–protein interface at a higher rate than the default function and performs substantially better in predicting changes in free energy of binding due to mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20623647     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  9 in total

1.  Engineered oligomerization state of OmpF protein through computational design decouples oligomer dissociation from unfolding.

Authors:  Hammad Naveed; David Jimenez-Morales; Jun Tian; Volga Pasupuleti; Linda J Kenney; Jie Liang
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  EvoEF2: accurate and fast energy function for computational protein design.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Robin Pearce; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Expanded explorations into the optimization of an energy function for protein design.

Authors:  Yao-Ming Huang; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Spatial organization of hydrophobic and charged residues affects protein thermal stability and binding affinity.

Authors:  Fausta Desantis; Mattia Miotto; Lorenzo Di Rienzo; Edoardo Milanetti; Giancarlo Ruocco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Scientific benchmarks for guiding macromolecular energy function improvement.

Authors:  Andrew Leaver-Fay; Matthew J O'Meara; Mike Tyka; Ron Jacak; Yifan Song; Elizabeth H Kellogg; James Thompson; Ian W Davis; Roland A Pache; Sergey Lyskov; Jeffrey J Gray; Tanja Kortemme; Jane S Richardson; James J Havranek; Jack Snoeyink; David Baker; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Contacts-based prediction of binding affinity in protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Anna Vangone; Alexandre Mjj Bonvin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  How structure defines affinity in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Ariel Erijman; Eran Rosenthal; Julia M Shifman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Protein engineering by highly parallel screening of computationally designed variants.

Authors:  Mark G F Sun; Moon-Hyeong Seo; Satra Nim; Carles Corbi-Verge; Philip M Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  A general-purpose protein design framework based on mining sequence-structure relationships in known protein structures.

Authors:  Jianfu Zhou; Alexandra E Panaitiu; Gevorg Grigoryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.