Literature DB >> 20622364

Daily online localization using implanted fiducial markers and its impact on planning target volume for carcinoma prostate.

Robin Khosa1, Sapna Nangia, Kundan S Chufal, D Ghosh, Rakesh Kaul, Lalit Sharma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to assess prostate motion on daily basis with respect to setup and to compare the shifts based on bony anatomy and gold fiducial markers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gold fiducial markers were inserted in prostate under U/S guidance and daily portal images were taken and compared with digitally reconstructed images, both using bony landmarks and fiducial markers as reference. A dose of 2 MU was given for two orthogonal images daily. The mean and standard deviation of displacement using gold seeds and bone were calculated. Systematic and random errors were generated. The planning target volume (PTV) was calculated using the Van Herk formula.
RESULTS: A total of 180 portal images from 10 patients were studied. The mean displacement along x, y and z axes was 1.67 mm, 3.58 mm, and 1.76 mm using fiducial markers and 2.12 mm, 3.47 mm, and 2.09 mm using bony landmarks, respectively. The mean internal organ motion was 1.23 mm (+1.45), 3.11 mm (+2.69 mm); and 1.87 mm (+1.67 mm) along x, y and z axes, respectively. The PTV to account for prostate motion if daily matching was not done was 4.64 mm, 10.41 mm and 4.40 mm along lateral, superoinferior, and anteroposterior directions, respectively. If bony landmarks were used for daily matching, margins of 3.61 mm, 7.31 mm, and 4.72 mm in lateral, superoinferior, and anteroposterior directions should be added to the clinical target volume.
CONCLUSION: Daily alignment using gold fiducial markers is an effective method of localizing prostate displacement. It provides the option of reducing margins, thus limiting normal tissue toxicity and allowing the possibility of dose escalation for better long-term control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20622364     DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.65244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther        ISSN: 1998-4138            Impact factor:   1.805


  5 in total

1.  Qualitative evaluation of fiducial markers for radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Gil'ad N Cohen; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-16

2.  Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Lawrence J Sheplan Olsen; Kevin Stephans; Rahul Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Positioning error and expanding margins of planning target volume with kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Wen-Ling Wang; Yi-Qun Liu; Hong-Min Dong; Yin-Xiang Hu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Assessment of interfractional prostate motion in patients immobilized in the prone position using a thermoplastic shell.

Authors:  Itaru Ikeda; Takashi Mizowaki; Yohei Sawada; Manabu Nakata; Yoshiki Norihisa; Masakazu Ogura; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Determination of optimal fiducial marker across image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) modalities: visibility and artifact analysis of gold, carbon, and polymer fiducial markers.

Authors:  Lydia L Handsfield; Ning J Yue; Jinghao Zhou; Ting Chen; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.