Literature DB >> 20621900

Extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with recently reduced mobility: a randomized trial.

Russell D Hull1, Sebastian M Schellong, Victor F Tapson, Manuel Monreal, Meyer-Michel Samama, Philippe Nicol, Eric Vicaut, Alexander G G Turpie, Roger D Yusen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extended-duration low-molecular-weight heparin has been shown to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in high-risk surgical patients.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended-duration enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients.
DESIGN: Randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Randomization was computer-generated. Allocation was centralized. Patients, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00077753)
SETTING: 370 sites in 20 countries across North and South America, Europe, and Asia. PATIENTS: Acutely ill medical patients 40 years or older with recently reduced mobility (bed rest or sedentary without [level 1] or with [level 2] bathroom privileges). Eligibility criteria for patients with level 2 immobility were amended to include only those who had additional VTE risk factors (age >75 years, history of VTE, or active or previous cancer) after interim analyses suggested lower-than-expected VTE rates. INTERVENTION: Enoxaparin, 40 mg/d subcutaneously (2975 patients), or placebo (2988 patients), for 28 +/- 4 days after receiving open-label enoxaparin for an initial 10 +/- 4 days. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence of VTE up to day 28 and of major bleeding events up to 48 hours after the last study treatment dose.
RESULTS: Extended-duration enoxaparin reduced VTE incidence compared with placebo (2.5% vs. 4%; absolute risk difference favoring enoxaparin, -1.53% [95.8% CI, -2.54% to -0.52%]). Enoxaparin increased major bleeding events (0.8% vs. 0.3%; absolute risk difference favoring placebo, 0.51% [95% CI, 0.12% to 0.89%]). The benefits of extended-duration enoxaparin seemed to be restricted to women, patients older than 75 years, and those with level 1 immobility. LIMITATION: Estimates of efficacy and safety for the overall trial population are difficult to interpret because of the change in eligibility criteria during the trial.
CONCLUSION: Use of extended-duration enoxaparin reduces VTE more than it increases major bleeding events in acutely ill medical patients with level 1 immobility, those older than 75 years, and women. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Sanofi-aventis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621900     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-1-201007060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  98 in total

1.  Assessment of extended-duration enoxaparin for VTE.

Authors:  Helene Myrvang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Low molecular weight heparin biosimilars: how much similarity for how much clinical benefit?

Authors:  Ludovic Drouet
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Wendy Lim; Andrew S Dunn; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Elie A Akl; Deborah J Cook; Alex A Balekian; Russell C Klein; Hoang Le; Sam Schulman; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Interventional trials with anticoagulants in acutely ill medical patients: a methodological pitfall?

Authors:  Francesco Violi; Ludovica Perri; Lorenzo Loffredo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Canadian consensus recommendations on the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. Part 1: prophylaxis.

Authors:  J C Easaw; M A Shea-Budgell; C M J Wu; P M Czaykowski; J Kassis; B Kuehl; H J Lim; M MacNeil; D Martinusen; P A McFarlane; E Meek; O Moodley; S Shivakumar; V Tagalakis; S Welch; P Kavan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Direct oral anticoagulants for extended-duration thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medically ill patients: are we there yet?

Authors:  Majed S Al Yami; Osamah M Alfayez; Sawsan M Kurdi; Razan Alsheikh
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Cost-Effectiveness of Betrixaban Compared with Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Nonsurgical Patients with Acute Medical Illness in the United States.

Authors:  Holly Guy; Vicki Laskier; Mark Fisher; W Richey Neuman; Iwona Bucior; Steven Deitelzweig; Alexander T Cohen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in elderly patients with multimorbidity.

Authors:  Maura Marcucci; Alfonso Iorio; Alessandro Nobili; Mauro Tettamanti; Luca Pasina; Codjo Djignefa Djade; Alessandra Marengoni; Francesco Salerno; Salvatore Corrao; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum period.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel; Babak B Navi; Nandita Sriram; Dominic A Hovsepian; Richard B Devereux; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.