Literature DB >> 20621759

Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield?

Norman A Johnson1.   

Abstract

Hybrid incompatibility (including sterility, lethality, and less extreme negative effects) interests evolutionary biologists because of its role in speciation as a reproductive isolating barrier. It also has unusual genetic properties, being mainly due to interactions between at least two genes. Recent studies have identified some of the interacting genes that underlie hybrid incompatibility. These genes represent a wide array of functions, including those involved in oxidative respiration, nuclear trafficking, DNA-binding, and plant defense. Accumulating evidence suggests genomic conflict frequently drives the divergence causing incompatibilities in hybrids. The evidence bearing on this genomic conflict hypothesis is assessed and ways to test it conclusively are suggested. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621759     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  80 in total

1.  The nature of interactions that contribute to postzygotic reproductive isolation in hybrid copepods.

Authors:  Christopher S Willett
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Centromere-associated meiotic drive and female fitness variation in Mimulus.

Authors:  Lila Fishman; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Neighboring genes for DNA-binding proteins rescue male sterility in Drosophila hybrids.

Authors:  Marjorie A Liénard; Luciana O Araripe; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation.

Authors:  John H Werren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Haldane's rule in the 21st century.

Authors:  M Schilthuizen; M C W G Giesbers; L W Beukeboom
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Sexually antagonistic zygotic drive: a new form of genetic conflict between the sex chromosomes.

Authors:  Urban Friberg; William R Rice
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  A rare exception to Haldane's rule: Are X chromosomes key to hybrid incompatibilities?

Authors:  P A Moran; M G Ritchie; N W Bailey
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Genetic conflicts: the usual suspects and beyond.

Authors:  Richard N McLaughlin; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Investigating incipient speciation in Arabidopsis lyrata from patterns of transmission ratio distortion.

Authors:  Johanna Leppälä; Folmer Bokma; Outi Savolainen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.