Literature DB >> 20621746

How do structured education programmes work? An ethnographic investigation of the dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) programme for type 1 diabetes patients in the UK.

Julia Lawton1, David Rankin2.   

Abstract

Structured education programmes (SEPs) for patients with diabetes and other chronic diseases are being widely adopted across the UK and elsewhere. Trials suggest they are more efficacious than didactic approaches, with patients showing improvements in learning, blood glucose control and quality of life. However, the reasons for these improvements are not well understood. To establish how, and why, SEPs work, we undertook a qualitative investigation of the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) programme. DAFNE is a well-established SEP for type 1 diabetes patients in the UK, which teaches them to alter their insulin doses in order to improve dietary freedom and blood glucose control. Six five-day courses were observed and in-depth interviews conducted with 30 patients aged 18-59 years on completion of the courses. Prior to their courses, many patients had developed protective behaviours and risk-avoiding strategies, such as running blood glucose levels high to avoid hypoglycaemia, or low to avoid developing complications. Implementing the insulin dose adjustments recommended on the course often required patients to move out of comfort zones and take what they had perceived, initially at least, as risks. In order to understand and explain course dynamics and outcomes, we draw upon Adams' concept of the risk-thermostat - which presupposes that all individuals are equipped with an internal instrument by which they gauge and respond to risk - and add a corporeal dimension to it. In doing so, we highlight the dynamic ways in which (embodied) group interactions and experiences, and their enmeshment with other aspects of course delivery, such as educator surveillance and employment of course rules, helped to enhance learning and promote patients' transformations into insulin dose adjusting subjects. This included inter-corporeal processes through which patients recalibrated their risk thermostats in light of the insulin dose adjustment experiences of others. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621746     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

Review 1.  Behavioural implications of traditional treatment and closed-loop automated insulin delivery systems in Type 1 diabetes: applying a cognitive restraint theory framework.

Authors:  A R Kahkoska; E J Mayer-Davis; K K Hood; D M Maahs; K S Burger
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  Modeling predictors of changes in glycemic control and diabetes-specific quality of life amongst adults with type 1 diabetes 1 year after structured education in flexible, intensive insulin therapy.

Authors:  Debbie Cooke; Rod Bond; Julia Lawton; David Rankin; Simon Heller; Marie Clark; Jane Speight
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-06-14

3.  A longitudinal qualitative study examining the factors impacting on the ability of persons with T1DM to assimilate the Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) principles into daily living and how these factors change over time.

Authors:  Dympna Casey; Kathy Murphy; Julia Lawton; Florence Findlay White; Sean Dineen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Rationale and study design for a randomised controlled trial to reduce sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: project stand (Sedentary Time ANd diabetes).

Authors:  Emma G Wilmot; Melanie J Davies; Charlotte L Edwardson; Trish Gorely; Kamlesh Khunti; Myra Nimmo; Thomas Yates; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Diabetes self-management arrangements in Europe: a realist review to facilitate a project implemented in six countries.

Authors:  Antonis A Kousoulis; Evridiki Patelarou; Sue Shea; Christina Foss; Ingrid A Ruud Knutsen; Elka Todorova; Poli Roukova; Mari Carmen Portillo; María J Pumar-Méndez; Agurtzane Mujika; Anne Rogers; Ivaylo Vassilev; Manuel Serrano-Gil; Christos Lionis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  When patient-reported experience does not match change in clinical outcomes: A perplexing view from the inside of a diabetes distress intervention.

Authors:  Lawrence Fisher; William Polonsky; Vicky Bowyer; Danielle Hessler
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.852

7.  Supporting self-management after attending a structured education programme: a qualitative longitudinal investigation of type 1 diabetes patients' experiences and views.

Authors:  David Rankin; Debbie D Cooke; Jackie Elliott; Simon R Heller; Julia Lawton
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The 5x1 DAFNE study protocol: a cluster randomised trial comparing a standard 5 day DAFNE course delivered over 1 week against DAFNE training delivered over 1 day a week for 5 consecutive weeks.

Authors:  Jackie Elliott; Julia Lawton; David Rankin; Celia Emery; Mike Campbell; Simon Dixon; Simon Heller
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.763

9.  What happens when patients know more than their doctors? Experiences of health interactions after diabetes patient education: a qualitative patient-led study.

Authors:  Rosamund Snow; Charlotte Humphrey; Jane Sandall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Parental knowledge and metabolic control of children and young adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Anna Stefanowicz; Malgorzata Mysliwiec; Elzbieta Adamkiewicz-Drozynska
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.