Literature DB >> 20621655

Welfare of the minipig with special reference to use in regulatory toxicology studies.

Lars Ellegaard1, Andrew Cunningham, Sandra Edwards, Nanna Grand, Timo Nevalainen, Mark Prescott, Teun Schuurman.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the animal welfare challenges associated with the use of minipigs in toxicology testing, and compares these to published knowledge on the other widely used non-rodent species (dogs and non-human primates). Welfare challenges arise from housing and management of populations under laboratory conditions, and from the procedures carried out for product evaluation. Welfare assessment requires a multidisciplinary approach: cardiovascular parameters, adrenocortical hormones and behaviour are well known parameters. However, reliable non-invasive methods to assess welfare and species-specific benchmarks need further development in minipigs. Husbandry of minipigs (housing, diet, and socialisation needs) to promote good welfare is described in the revised Appendix A of the European Convention (ETS 123). This has been supplemented by knowledge of species biology and expert opinion from experienced minipig users. Challenges when using minipigs in toxicity testing have been reviewed in detail. Although deeper location of the peripheral blood vessels makes blood sampling more challenging, samples can be taken with minimal distress when staff members are well trained. Temporary and chronic vascular catheters can also be used for frequent sampling, and are likely to improve the welfare of the animals. Available training courses with a focus on stress free handling and dosing, as well as surgical placement of temporary and chronic vascular catheters, should be utilised to improve welfare during these procedures. Humane endpoints have been described, mainly based on current industry practices, but further scientific investigations are required. From an animal welfare perspective there are no basic restrictions to using minipigs in toxicity testing that are unique to this species. We conclude that it is easier to keep minipigs to a good standard of welfare under laboratory conditions than it is for dogs or non-human primates, since minipigs are not athletic (like dogs) or arboreal (like non-human primates).
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621655     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  8 in total

1.  Novel technique for retroperitoneal implantation of telemetry transmitters for physiologic monitoring in Göttingen minipigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Scott Willens; David M Cox; Ernest H Braue; Todd M Myers; Matthew D Wegner
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  A novel in vitro allometric scaling methodology for aldehyde oxidase substrates to enable selection of appropriate species for traditional allometry.

Authors:  Rachel D Crouch; J Matthew Hutzler; J Scott Daniels
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 1.908

3.  Minipig as a potential translatable model for monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous administration.

Authors:  Yanan Zheng; Devin B Tesar; Lisa Benincosa; Herbert Birnböck; C Andrew Boswell; Daniela Bumbaca; Kyra J Cowan; Dimitry M Danilenko; Ann L Daugherty; Paul J Fielder; Hans Peter Grimm; Amita Joshi; Nicole Justies; Gerry Kolaitis; Nicholas Lewin-Koh; Jing Li; Sami McVay; Jennifer O'Mahony; Michael Otteneder; Michael Pantze; Wendy S Putnam; Zhihua J Qiu; Jane Ruppel; Thomas Singer; Oliver Stauch; Frank-Peter Theil; Jennifer Visich; Jihong Yang; Yong Ying; Leslie A Khawli; Wolfgang F Richter
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 4.  Animal Models and Alternatives in Vaginal Research: a Comparative Review.

Authors:  Jennifer M McCracken; Gisele A Calderon; Andrew J Robinson; Courtney N Sullivan; Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez; Julie C E Hakim
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Report on a large animal study with Göttingen Minipigs where regenerates and controls for articular cartilage were created in a large number. Focus on the conditions of the operated stifle joints and suggestions for standardized procedures.

Authors:  Markus L Schwarz; Gregor Reisig; Andy Schütte; Kristianna Becker; Susanne Serba; Elmar Forsch; Steffen Thier; Stefan Fickert; Tamara Lenz; Christel Weiß; Svetlana Hetjens; Frederic Bludau; Friederike Bothe; Wiltrud Richter; Barbara Schneider-Wald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Refining restraint techniques for research pigs through habituation.

Authors:  Carly I O'Malley; Raina Hubley; Halimatou Tambadou; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-23

7.  Performance of conventional pigs and Göttingen miniature pigs in a spatial holeboard task: effects of the putative muscarinic cognition impairer Biperiden.

Authors:  Elise Gieling; Welmoed Wehkamp; Remco Willigenburg; Rebecca E Nordquist; Niels-Christian Ganderup; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.759

8.  Social housing of non-rodents during cardiovascular recordings in safety pharmacology and toxicology studies.

Authors:  Helen Prior; Anna Bottomley; Pascal Champéroux; Jason Cordes; Eric Delpy; Noel Dybdal; Nick Edmunds; Mike Engwall; Mike Foley; Michael Hoffmann; Robert Kaiser; Ken Meecham; Stéphane Milano; Aileen Milne; Rick Nelson; Brian Roche; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Gemma Ward; Kathryn Chapman
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.950

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.