Literature DB >> 20621562

Effects of antihypertensive treatment after acute stroke in the Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study (COSSACS): a prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial.

Thompson G Robinson1, John F Potter, Gary A Ford, Christopher J Bulpitt, Julia Chernova, Carol Jagger, Martin A James, Joanne Knight, Hugh S Markus, Amit K Mistri, Neil R Poulter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients with acute stroke are taking antihypertensive drugs on hospital admission. However, whether such treatment should be continued during the immediate post-stroke period is unclear. We therefore aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of continuing or stopping pre-existing antihypertensive drugs in patients who had recently had a stroke.
METHODS: The Continue or Stop Post-Stroke Antihypertensives Collaborative Study (COSSACS) was a UK multicentre, prospective, randomised, open, blinded-endpoint trial. Patients were recruited at 49 UK National Institute for Health Research Stroke Research Network centres from January 1, 2003, to March 31, 2009. Patients aged over 18 years who were taking antihypertensive drugs were enrolled within 48 h of stroke and the last dose of antihypertensive drug. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by secure internet central randomisation to either continue or stop pre-existing antihypertensive drugs for 2 weeks. Patients and clinicians who randomly assigned patients were unmasked to group allocation. Clinicians who assessed 2-week outcomes and 6-month outcomes were masked to group allocation. The primary endpoint was death or dependency at 2 weeks, with dependency defined as a modified Rankin scale score greater than 3 points. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register, number ISRCTN89712435.
FINDINGS: 763 patients were assigned to continue (n=379) or stop (n=384) pre-existing antihypertensive drugs. 72 of 379 patients in the continue group and 82 of 384 patients in the stop group reached the primary endpoint (relative risk 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.14; p=0.3). The difference in systolic blood pressure at 2 weeks between the continue group and the stop group was 13 mm Hg (95% CI 10-17) and the difference in diastolic blood pressure was 8 mm Hg (6-10; difference between groups p<0.0001). No substantial differences were observed between groups in rates of serious adverse events, 6-month mortality, or major cardiovascular events.
INTERPRETATION: Continuation of antihypertensive drugs did not reduce 2-week death or dependency, cardiovascular event rate, or mortality at 6 months. Lower blood pressure levels in those who continued antihypertensive treatment after acute mild stroke were not associated with an increase in adverse events. These neutral results might be because COSSACS was underpowered owing to early termination of the trial, and support the continuation of ongoing research trials. FUNDING: The Health Foundation and The Stroke Association. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621562     DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70163-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Neurol        ISSN: 1474-4422            Impact factor:   44.182


  56 in total

1.  Emergency and critical care management of acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Stephen A Figueroa; Weidan Zhao; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 2.  Timing of blood pressure lowering in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Cheryl Carcel; Craig S Anderson
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  [Difficult decisions in stroke therapy].

Authors:  M Endres; M Grond; W Hacke; M Ebinger; P D Schellinger; M Dichgans
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Antihypertensive therapy in acute ischemic stroke: where do we stand?

Authors:  Eleni Georgianou; Panagiotis I Georgianos; Konstantinos Petidis; Vasilios G Athyros; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Asterios Karagiannis
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.012

5.  Effect of blood pressure on 3-month functional outcome in the subacute stage of ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jihoon Kang; Youngchai Ko; Jung Hyun Park; Wook-Joo Kim; Myung Suk Jang; Mi Hwa Yang; JiSung Lee; Juneyoung Lee; Moon-Ku Han; Philip B Gorelick; Hee-Joon Bae
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 6.  Control of blood pressure in hypertensive neurological emergencies.

Authors:  Lisa Manning; Thompson G Robinson; Craig S Anderson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Prehospital systolic blood pressure is higher in acute stroke compared with stroke mimics.

Authors:  Laura C Gioia; Rahel T Zewude; Mahesh P Kate; Kim Liss; Brian H Rowe; Brian Buck; Thomas Jeerakathil; Ken Butcher
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Blood pressure lowering in acute phase of stroke: latest evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Sully Xiomara Fuentes Patarroyo; Craig Anderson
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 9.  The management of hypertension for an acute stroke: what is the blood pressure goal?

Authors:  Philip B Gorelick; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  An Update on Inpatient Hypertension Management.

Authors:  R Neal Axon; Mason Turner; Ryan Buckley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.