Literature DB >> 20621553

Economic gains from electronic message exchange: the importance of working procedures.

Margrethe Aanesen1, Mikko Moilanen, Frank Olsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: There are several cost-benefit evaluations of introducing new technology for administrative purposes in the health care sector. Whereas some of these recognise the importance of adapting the working procedures to the new technology, very few look into the consequences of delays in adaptation to the new technology. In this paper, we focus on the consequences of keeping old working procedures, although new technology is implemented.
METHODS: Based on on-site observations we have estimated the economic gains of implementing electronic message exchange in the health care sector depending on which working procedures are applied. Then we continue by using a dynamic cost-benefit analysis (CBA) in order to take into account that conversion to new working procedures takes place over time, and we demonstrate the loss in potential gains due to such a delay.
RESULTS: Keeping working procedures fit to old technology when new technology is implemented may imply that only between 40 and 50% of the potential time savings (benefits) are realised. In a dynamic perspective, the keeping of double procedures for 10 years and more will jeopardise the economic gains for surgeries, whereas hospitals still may have an economic gain. The delay in conversion to new working procedures implies that only 50% of the dynamic net present value of the gains is realised. The longer it takes before the old procedures are abandoned the lower is the dynamic net present value of the gains. This is due to the discounting of future gains.
CONCLUSIONS: These are all arguments for emphasising and putting resources into training and motivation programs for employees when new technology is being implemented. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: We have only considered quantifiable effects of electronic message exchange in the health care sector, and only for hospitals and surgeries. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621553     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  3 in total

1.  A qualitative evaluation of general practitioners' views on protocol-driven eReferral in Scotland.

Authors:  Matt-Mouley Bouamrane; Frances S Mair
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Implementing a National Electronic Referral Program: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Marcella McGovern; Maria Quinlan; Gerardine Doyle; Gemma Moore; Susi Geiger
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 3.  A systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of electronic discharge communications.

Authors:  Laura K Sevick; Rosmin Esmail; Karen Tang; Diane L Lorenzetti; Paul Ronksley; Matthew James; Maria Santana; William A Ghali; Fiona Clement
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.