Literature DB >> 20621538

Outcome and safety of TNFα antagonist therapy in 475 consecutive outpatients (with rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthropathies) treated by a single physician according to their eligibility for clinical trials.

Jean-Marie Berthelot1, Stéphanie Benoist-Gérard, Benoît le Goff, Florence Muller-Chevalet, Yves Maugars.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of TNFα antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthropathies (SpA) treated by a single physician, according to the presence of the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria used to select patients for pivotal clinical trials.
METHODS: Effectiveness was evaluated based on four categories defined by the DAS28-ESR and BASDAI values, from a very good response (mean DAS-28-ESR less than 3.2 and mean BASDAI less than 2.0) to failure (DAS28-ESR unchanged or greater than 5.1 and BASDAI unchanged). Serious adverse events were defined as events that required permanent TNFα antagonist discontinuation or that led to sequelae, hospital admission, or death.
RESULTS: The study included 475 patients, 230 with RA, 226 with SpA, 10 with juvenile-onset arthritis, and nine with unclassifiable arthritis. Mean number of TNFα antagonists used per patient was 1.3 and mean duration of TNFα antagonist treatment was 28±23 months. Overall, 41% of patients met the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria used in pivotal trials; the proportion was 43% in the RA group and 40% in the SpA group. These patients had a 3-fold higher rate of very good responses (54 versus 19%) and a 5-fold lower rate of failures (5 versus 25%) compared to the other patients. Of the 15 (3%) patients who died, none met pivotal trial criteria. The group that met pivotal trial criteria had a significantly lower rate of serious adverse events (11 versus 16%; Chi(2), p=0.0001), although age was similar in the two groups (53±16 years versus 57±14 years).
CONCLUSION: Patients meeting the selection criteria used in pivotal trials had a higher response rate and significantly fewer serious adverse events.
Copyright © 2010 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621538     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  4 in total

1.  Comparative persistence of the TNF antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis--a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Anat Fisher; Ken Bassett; James M Wright; M Alan Brookhart; Hugh Freeman; Colin R Dormuth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Prescriber preference for a particular tumour necrosis factor antagonist drug and treatment discontinuation: population-based cohort.

Authors:  Anat Fisher; Ken Bassett; James M Wright; M Alan Brookhart; Hugh J Freeman; Colin R Dormuth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Microbiota and chronic inflammatory arthritis: an interwoven link.

Authors:  Andrea Picchianti Diamanti; M Manuela Rosado; Bruno Laganà; Raffaele D'Amelio
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.531

4.  Heterogeneity in Comparisons of Discontinuation of Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Rheumatoid Arthritis - A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anat Fisher; Ken Bassett; Gautam Goel; Dana Stanely; M Alan Brookhart; Hugh R Freeman; James M Wright; Colin R Dormuth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.