Literature DB >> 20621266

The validity of state survey estimates of binge drinking.

Mallie J Paschall1, Christopher L Ringwalt, Amy M Gitelman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: State survey-based estimates of binge drinking may be useful for estimating the need for alcohol prevention and treatment services and for evaluating the effects of state alcohol control policies. However, as a result of declining survey response rates, there is growing concern about the validity of state survey estimates of binge drinking.
PURPOSE: This study aims to examine the construct validity of state survey-based prevalence estimates of binge drinking.
METHODS: State prevalence estimates of binge drinking in the past 30 days for 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007 were obtained from published reports or public use data for the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, and Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Construct validity was assessed in 2009 by examining correlations between these survey estimates and, for corresponding years, state per capita alcohol consumption levels (based on sales data for beer, wine, and spirits) and the percentage of drivers in fatal motor-vehicle crashes with a blood alcohol concentration of at least 0.08.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of the correlations between state survey-based binge drinking estimates and per capita alcohol sales data were significant and moderate to strong (r > or =0.30, range=0.16-0.60). Similarly, 86% of the state survey binge drinking estimates were moderately or strongly correlated with the percentage of drivers in fatal crashes with blood alcohol concentration > or =0.08 (range=0.11-0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that state survey-based estimates of binge drinking have construct validity and therefore can be used to investigate relationships between state alcohol policies and other state characteristics and the prevalence of this behavior. 2010 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20621266      PMCID: PMC2904643          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

1.  Beer drinking accounts for most of the hazardous alcohol consumption reported in the United States.

Authors:  J D Rogers; T K Greenfield
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1999-11

2.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Prevalence of adult binge drinking: a comparison of two national surveys.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Joseph C Gfroerer; Robert D Brewer; Timothy S Naimi; Ali Mokdad; Wayne H Giles
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 4.  New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Angela M Kempf; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  What do binge drinkers drink? Implications for alcohol control policy.

Authors:  Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Jacqueline W Miller; Catherine Okoro; Chetna Mehrotra
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Adult health behaviors.

Authors:  Karen L Schneider; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  The relationship of underage drinking laws to reductions in drinking drivers in fatal crashes in the United States.

Authors:  James C Fell; Deborah A Fisher; Robert B Voas; Kenneth Blackman; A Scott Tippetts
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2008-04-09

8.  The state sets the rate: the relationship among state-specific college binge drinking, state binge drinking rates, and selected state alcohol control policies.

Authors:  Toben F Nelson; Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  State alcohol-use estimates among youth and adults, 1993-2005.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Hayley A Nelson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Characteristics of telephone survey respondents according to willingness to participate.

Authors:  Lynda F Voigt; Thomas D Koepsell; Janet R Daling
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Alcohol policies and impaired driving in the United States: Effects of driving- vs. drinking-oriented policies.

Authors:  Ziming Xuan; Jason G Blanchette; Toben F Nelson; Timothy C Heeren; Thien H Nguyen; Timothy S Naimi
Journal:  Int J Alcohol Drug Res       Date:  2015

2.  The alcohol policy environment and policy subgroups as predictors of binge drinking measures among US adults.

Authors:  Ziming Xuan; Jason Blanchette; Toben F Nelson; Timothy Heeren; Nadia Oussayef; Timothy S Naimi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A new scale of the U.S. alcohol policy environment and its relationship to binge drinking.

Authors:  Timothy S Naimi; Jason Blanchette; Toben F Nelson; Thien Nguyen; Nadia Oussayef; Timothy C Heeren; Paul Gruenewald; James Mosher; Ziming Xuan
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  State Prevalence and Ranks of Adolescent Substance Use: Implications for Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Benmei Liu; Li Zhu
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.830

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.