Literature DB >> 20620835

In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.

Sonia Kahlon1, Daniel Rinchuse, Janet M Robison, John M Close.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Numerous in-vitro studies have been conducted with various archwire-ligation combinations to evaluate the effect of wire size and ligation method on frictional resistance. The aim of this in-vitro study was to compare the frictional resistance during sliding mechanics with Gianelly-type stainless steel working wires, Leone slide ligature, conventional elastic ligature, and stainless steel (SS) ligature, and a conventional bracket and active and passive self-ligating brackets.
METHODS: Three ligation methods with Victory (V) brackets--Leone (VLeone), conventional (regular) elastic (VReg), and SS (VSS)--were used with standard SS brackets, and 2 self-ligating brackets--Damon MX (Ormco/"A", St. Paul, Minn) (DMX) and In-Ovation R (GAC Intl., Bohemia, NY)--were used with 2 rectangular SS wires (0.016 x 0.022 and 0.018 x 0.022 in). Therefore, 5 ligation methods and 2 wire sizes were evaluated with respect to their effects on frictional resistance.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the SS ligation method and DMX (neither produced measurable static friction). For the wire size 0.016 x 0.022-in SS, the DMX and SS produced significantly less static friction than the In-Ovation R, VLeone, and VReg. The In-Ovation R produced significantly less friction than both the VLeone and VReg, whereas the VLeone produced significantly less friction than the VReg. For the wire size 0.018 x 0.022-in SS, the overall results were the same, except that the In-Ovation R produced significantly more friction than the VLeone. An increase in wire size (from 0.016 x 0.022 to 0.018 x 0.022 in) led to an increase in friction in all bracket-archwire combinations (except DMX and VSS, which showed no measurable friction at either wire size).
CONCLUSIONS: The Leone slide ligature showed less friction at both wire sizes than VReg; however, it showed significantly more friction than both DMX and VSS. DMX and VSS brackets produced no measurable friction with either 0.016 x 0.022-in or 0.018 x 0.022-in wires. An increase in wire size (from 0.016 x 0.022 to 0.018 x 0.022 in) led to an increase in friction in all bracket-archwire combinations (excluding DMX and VSS, which showed no measurable friction at either wire size). Copyright (c) 2010 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of maxillary arch force/couple systems for a simulated high canine malocclusion: Part 1. Passive ligation.

Authors:  Jonathan Fok; Roger W Toogood; Hisham Badawi; Jason P Carey; Paul W Major
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Comparison of friction produced by two types of orthodontic bracket protectors.

Authors:  Steyner de Lima Mendonça; Otávio José Praxedes Neto; Patricia Teixeira de Oliveira; Patricia Bittencourt Dutra dos Santos; Fábio Henrique de Sá Leitão Pinheiro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

3.  Effect of ligation method on maxillary arch force/moment systems for a simulated lingual incisor malalignment.

Authors:  Surbhi Seru; Dan L Romanyk; Roger W Toogood; Jason P Carey; Paul W Major
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2014-10-30

4.  Effects of intraoral aging of arch-wires on frictional forces: An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Avinash Kumar; Arifa Khanam; Hajra Ghafoor
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  Comparison of frictional forces during the closure of extraction spaces in passive self-ligating brackets and conventionally ligated brackets using the finite element method.

Authors:  Sandra-Liliana Gómez-Gómez; Natalia Sánchez-Obando; María-Antonia Álvarez-Castrillón; Yesid Montoya-Goez; Carlos M Ardila
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-05-01

6.  Effect of 0.05% Sodium Fluoride Mouthwash on Surface Roughness and Friction between Ceramic Brackets and Rhodium-Coated and Uncoated Stainless Steel Wires.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Hannaneh Ghadirian; Tabassom Hooshmand; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Maryam Nasiri; Maryam Javaheri Mahd
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-04-30

7.  Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.

Authors:  Renata C Leal; Flávia L B Amaral; Fabiana M G França; Roberta T Basting; Cecilia P Turssi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Analysis of the characteristics of slot design affecting resistance to sliding during active archwire configurations.

Authors:  Riccardo Nucera; Antonino Lo Giudice; Giovanni Matarese; Alessandro Artemisia; Ennio Bramanti; Paolo Crupi; Giancarlo Cordasco
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Comparative study of friction between metallic and conventional interactive self-ligating brackets in different alignment conditions.

Authors:  Sérgio Ricardo Jakob; Davison Matheus; Maria Cristina Jimenez-Pellegrin; Cecília Pedroso Turssi; Flávia Lucisano Botelho Amaral
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

10.  Biomechanical investigation of orthodontic treatment planning based on orthodontic force measurement and finite element method before implementation: A case study.

Authors:  Jianlei Wu; Yunfeng Liu; Jianxing Zhang; Wei Peng; Xianfeng Jiang
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.285

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.