Literature DB >> 20620590

Transgenic oncogenes induce oncogene-independent cancers with individual karyotypes and phenotypes.

Andreas Klein1, Nan Li, Joshua M Nicholson, Amanda A McCormack, Adolf Graessmann, Peter Duesberg.   

Abstract

Cancers are clones of autonomous cells defined by individual karyotypes, much like species. Despite such karyotypic evidence for causality, three to six synergistic mutations, termed oncogenes, are generally thought to cause cancer. To test single oncogenes, they are artificially activated with heterologous promoters and spliced into the germ line of mice to initiate cancers with collaborating spontaneous oncogenes. Because such cancers are studied as models for the treatment of natural cancers with related oncogenes, the following must be answered: 1) which oncogenes collaborate with the transgenes in cancers; 2) how do single transgenic oncogenes induce diverse cancers and hyperplasias; 3) what maintains cancers that lose initiating transgenes; 4) why are cancers aneuploid, over- and underexpressing thousands of normal genes? Here we try to answer these questions with the theory that carcinogenesis is a form of speciation. We postulate that transgenic oncogenes initiate carcinogenesis by inducing aneuploidy. Aneuploidy destabilizes the karyotype by unbalancing teams of mitosis genes. This instability thus catalyzes the evolution of new cancer species with individual karyotypes. Depending on their degree of aneuploidy, these cancers then evolve new subspecies. To test this theory, we have analyzed the karyotypes and phenotypes of mammary carcinomas of mice with transgenic SV40 tumor virus- and hepatitis B virus-derived oncogenes. We found that (1) a given transgene induced diverse carcinomas with individual karyotypes and phenotypes; (2) these karyotypes coevolved with newly acquired phenotypes such as drug resistance; (3) 8 of 12 carcinomas were transgene negative. Having found one-to-one correlations between individual karyotypes and phenotypes and consistent coevolutions of karyotypes and phenotypes, we conclude that carcinogenesis is a form of speciation and that individual karyotypes maintain cancers as they maintain species. Because activated oncogenes destabilize karyotypes and are dispensable in cancers, we conclude that they function indirectly, like carcinogens. Such oncogenes would thus not be valid models for the treatment of cancers. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620590     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  11 in total

1.  From aneuploidy to cancer: the evolution of a new species?

Authors:  Samuel Knauss; Andreas Klein
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  BubbleTree: an intuitive visualization to elucidate tumoral aneuploidy and clonality using next generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Michael Kuziora; Todd Creasy; Zhongwu Lai; Christopher Morehouse; Xiang Guo; Yinong Sebastian; Dong Shen; Jiaqi Huang; Jonathan R Dry; Feng Xue; Liyan Jiang; Yihong Yao; Brandon W Higgs
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Restoration of wild-type p53 in drug-resistant mouse breast cancer cells leads to differential gene expression, but is not sufficient to overcome the malignant phenotype.

Authors:  Benjamin Gottschalk; Andreas Klein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  SNP microarray analyses reveal copy number alterations and progressive genome reorganization during tumor development in SVT/t driven mice breast cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Standfuss; Heike Pospisil; Andreas Klein
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Karyotypic evolutions of cancer species in rats during the long latent periods after injection of nitrosourea.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Amanda McCormack; Daniele Mandrioli; Christian Fiala; C Marcelo Aldaz; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Will we cure cancer by sequencing thousands of genomes?

Authors:  Joshua M Nicholson
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers.

Authors:  Ankit Hirpara; Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Immortality of cancers: a consequence of inherent karyotypic variations and selections for autonomy.

Authors:  Peter Duesberg; Amanda McCormack
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Individual karyotypes at the origins of cervical carcinomas.

Authors:  Amanda McCormack; Jiang Lan Fan; Max Duesberg; Mathew Bloomfield; Christian Fiala; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Karyotype alteration generates the neoplastic phenotypes of SV40-infected human and rodent cells.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.