PURPOSE: Single nucleotide polymorphisms are inherited genetic variations that can predispose or protect individuals against clinical events. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphism profiling may improve the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 703 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer who had at least 5 years of followup after surgery. All patients were genotyped for 83 prostate cancer related single nucleotide polymorphisms using a low density oligonucleotide microarray. Baseline clinicopathological variables and single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed to predict biochemical recurrence within 5 years using stepwise logistic regression. Discrimination was measured by ROC curve AUC, specificity, sensitivity, predictive values, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination index. RESULTS: The overall biochemical recurrence rate was 35%. The model with the best fit combined 8 covariates, including the 5 clinicopathological variables prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, pathological stage, lymph node involvement and margin status, and 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms at the KLK2, SULT1A1 and TLR4 genes. Model predictive power was defined by 80% positive predictive value, 74% negative predictive value and an AUC of 0.78. The model based on clinicopathological variables plus single nucleotide polymorphisms showed significant improvement over the model without single nucleotide polymorphisms, as indicated by 23.3% net reclassification improvement (p = 0.003), integrated discrimination index (p <0.001) and likelihood ratio test (p <0.001). Internal validation proved model robustness (bootstrap corrected AUC 0.78, range 0.74 to 0.82). The calibration plot showed close agreement between biochemical recurrence observed and predicted probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy based on clinicopathological data can be significantly improved by including patient genetic information. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: Single nucleotide polymorphisms are inherited genetic variations that can predispose or protect individuals against clinical events. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphism profiling may improve the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional study of 703 patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer who had at least 5 years of followup after surgery. All patients were genotyped for 83 prostate cancer related single nucleotide polymorphisms using a low density oligonucleotide microarray. Baseline clinicopathological variables and single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed to predict biochemical recurrence within 5 years using stepwise logistic regression. Discrimination was measured by ROC curve AUC, specificity, sensitivity, predictive values, net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination index. RESULTS: The overall biochemical recurrence rate was 35%. The model with the best fit combined 8 covariates, including the 5 clinicopathological variables prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, pathological stage, lymph node involvement and margin status, and 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms at the KLK2, SULT1A1 and TLR4 genes. Model predictive power was defined by 80% positive predictive value, 74% negative predictive value and an AUC of 0.78. The model based on clinicopathological variables plus single nucleotide polymorphisms showed significant improvement over the model without single nucleotide polymorphisms, as indicated by 23.3% net reclassification improvement (p = 0.003), integrated discrimination index (p <0.001) and likelihood ratio test (p <0.001). Internal validation proved model robustness (bootstrap corrected AUC 0.78, range 0.74 to 0.82). The calibration plot showed close agreement between biochemical recurrence observed and predicted probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy based on clinicopathological data can be significantly improved by including patient genetic information. Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: C Gu; Q Li; Y Zhu; Y Qu; G Zhang; M Wang; Y Yang; J Wang; L Jin; Q Wei; D Ye Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: J Cheng; R P Ondracek; D C Mehedint; K A Kasza; B Xu; S Gill; G Azabdaftari; S Yao; C D Morrison; J L Mohler; J R Marshall Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-04-14 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Jyotsna Batra; Felicity Lose; Tracy O'Mara; Louise Marquart; Carson Stephens; Kimberly Alexander; Srilakshmi Srinivasan; Rosalind A Eeles; Douglas F Easton; Ali Amin Al Olama; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Michelle Guy; Kenneth Muir; Artitaya Lophatananon; Aneela A Rahman; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; Suzanne Chambers; Robert A Gardiner; Joanne Aitken; John Yaxley; Mary-Anne Kedda; Judith A Clements; Amanda B Spurdle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Thomas Van den Broeck; Steven Joniau; Liesbeth Clinckemalie; Christine Helsen; Stefan Prekovic; Lien Spans; Lorenzo Tosco; Hendrik Van Poppel; Frank Claessens Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.411