Literature DB >> 20620317

Is it safe to discharge intussusception patients after successful hydrostatic reduction?

Jill S Whitehouse1, David M Gourlay, Andrea L Winthrop, Laura D Cassidy, Marjorie J Arca.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether discharge from the emergency department (ED) after successful hydrostatic reduction (HR) of intussusception is safe.
METHODS: We conducted a single institution review of patient records with a diagnosis code of intussusception from 1995 to 2006. Data collected included age, clinical presentation, imaging, surgical interventions, pathology, recurrence, and disposition. Statistical analysis utilized chi(2) tests, where P < or = .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: A total of 309 patients with intussusception were identified. One hundred twenty-three patients (39.8%) required surgical intervention, 138 (44.6%) patients were managed nonoperatively as inpatients, and 48 (15.5%) were treated nonoperatively and discharged from the ED. There were 18 recurrences (5.8%). Recurrence rates did not significantly differ between patients who required operative reduction and those who were managed nonoperatively with HR and either observed as inpatients or discharged from the ED. Seven patients with recurrences required surgical intervention, and 1 of those children had a pathologic lead point, which was nonneoplastic.
CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates do not differ between children observed as inpatients and those discharged home after successful HR. Missed neoplastic pathologic lead points were not found in the patients who required an operation after a recurrence. Our data suggests that it is safe to discharge patients selectively from the ED after successful HR. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620317     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of intussusception: defining a better index of successful non-operative treatment.

Authors:  Basil Bekdash; Sean S Marven; Alan Sprigg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-12-20

2.  A retrospective study about incidental appendectomy during the laparoscopic treatment of intussusception.

Authors:  Tao Liu; Yibo Wu; Weijue Xu; Jiangbin Liu; Qingfeng Sheng; Zhibao Lv
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 3.  Management of intussusception in children: A systematic review.

Authors:  Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; L Grier Arthur; Regan F Williams; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Alana L Beres; Yue-Yung Hu; Elizabeth J Renaud; Robert Ricca; Mark B Slidell; Amy Taylor; Caitlin A Smith; Doug Miniati; Juan E Sola; Patricia Valusek; Loren Berman; Mehul V Raval; Ankush Gosain; Matthew B Dellinger; Stig Sømme; Cynthia D Downard; Jarod P McAteer; Akemi Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Development and Implementation of a Surgical Quality Improvement Pathway for Pediatric Intussusception Patients.

Authors:  Alexander V Chalphin; Stephanie K Serres; Rosella A Micalizzi; Michele Dawson; Caitlin Phinney; Angelique Hrycko; Ariel Martin-Quashie; Michael J Pepin; Charles J Smithers; Shawn J Rangel; Catherine Chen
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2019-08-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.