Literature DB >> 20620013

Variation in management of early breast cancer in the Netherlands, 2003-2006.

L N van Steenbergen1, L V van de Poll-Franse, M W J M Wouters, M L E A Jansen-Landheer, J W W Coebergh, H Struikmans, V C G Tjan-Heijnen, C J H van de Velde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To describe variation in staging and primary treatment by hospital characteristics including type and volume and region in patients with early breast cancer (BC) in the Netherlands, 2003-2006 after completion of national guidelines in 2002.
METHODS: All patients newly diagnosed with invasive BC in 2003-2006 and recorded in the Netherlands Cancer Registry were included (n = 51 354). Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined the influence of patient and hospital characteristics, also by region, on type of breast surgery, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), sentinel node procedure (SNP), and adjuvant irradiation and/or systemic treatment.
RESULTS: Patients <40 years more often underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) in general hospitals (OR 1.4 (95%CI 1.1-1.5)) than in teaching and academic hospitals, whereas patients of 40-69 years less often received BCS in an academic hospital (OR 0.9 (95%CI 0.8-1.0)) than in teaching hospitals. Patients with pT1-2N0 cancer more often underwent primary ALND in a general hospital than in a larger teaching or academic hospital. Type of hospital did not seem to affect utilization of adjuvant systemic therapy, but patient age and tumour size and grade did. Over time, patients more often received SNP, BCS, and adjuvant systemic therapy, primary ALND being on the decline, but with substantial regional variation between geographic regions.
CONCLUSION: With detailed evidence-based national guidelines since 2002 the considerable regional and hospital variation in staging procedures and primary treatment among newly diagnosed patients with early breast cancer in the Netherlands decreased markedly, suggesting the presence of late adaptors rather than specific hospital characteristics. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20620013     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

Review 1.  Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Bradley N Reames; Peter McCulloch; Andrew J Carr; W Bruce Campbell; John E Wennberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Trends in surgery and adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Philippa Youl; Shoni Philpot; Julie Moore; Michelle Morris; David E Theile
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Small but significant socioeconomic inequalities in axillary staging and treatment of breast cancer in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M J Aarts; V C Hamelinck; E Bastiaannet; J W W Coebergh; G J Liefers; A C Voogd; M van der Sangen; W J Louwman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Optimal Treatment Strategy in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Should We Be Cowboys or Chickens?

Authors:  Heleen S Snijders; Nicoline J van Leersum; Daan Henneman; Alexander C de Vries; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Anne M Stiggelbout; Michel W J M Wouters; Jan Willem T Dekker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Regional variation in breast cancer treatment in the Netherlands and the role of external peer review: a cohort study comprising 63,516 women.

Authors:  Melvin J Kilsdonk; Boukje Ac van Dijk; Renee Otter; Wim H van Harten; Sabine Siesling
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Treatment variation in patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in Alberta from 2002 to 2010: a population-based study.

Authors:  Stacey Fisher; He Gao; Yutaka Yasui; Kelly Dabbs; Marcy Winget
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Surgical Trends in Breast Cancer in Turkey: An Increase in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Güldeniz Karadeniz Çakmak; Selman Emiroğlu; Atakan Sezer; Nuh Zafer Canturk; Levent Yeniay; Bekir Kuru; Hasan Karanlık; Aykut Soyder; Şehsuvar Gökgöz; Gürhan Sakman; Muhammed Ucuncu; Mufide Nuran Akcay; Sadullah Girgin; Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Mustafa Emiroglu; Serdar Ozbas; Abdullah Bahadir Öz; Cumhur Arici; Osman Toktas; Orhan Demircan; Adnan Çalık; Ayfer Kamali Polat; Gokturk Maralcan; Seher Demirer; Vahit Ozmen
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-02

8.  Impact of Competition Versus Centralisation of Hospital Care on Process Quality: A Multilevel Analysis of Breast Cancer Surgery in France.

Authors:  Zeynep Or; Emeline Rococco; Mariama Touré; Julia Bonastre
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2022-04-01

9.  Geographic variation in attitudes regarding management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Logan R McNeil; Alex B Blair; Robert W Krell; Chunmeng Zhang; Aslam Ejaz; Vincent P Groot; Georgios Gemenetzis; James C Padussis; Massimo Falconi; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Chandrakanth Are; Jin He; Bradley N Reames
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-06

10.  Breast-Contour-Preserving Procedure as a Multidisciplinary Parameter of Esthetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Annnelotte van Bommel; Pauline Spronk; Marc Mureau; Sabine Siesling; Carolien Smorenburg; Rob Tollenaar; Marie-Jeanne Vrancken Peeters; Thijs van Dalen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.344

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.