BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging treatment for select patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVES: To report the oncologic outcome of HIFU as a primary care option for localized prostate cancer from a multicenter database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with localized PCa treated with curative intent and presenting at least a 2-yr follow-up from February 1993 were considered in this study. Previously irradiated patients were excluded from this analysis. In case of any residual or recurrent PCa, patients were systematically offered a second session. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine disease-free survival rates (DFSR). MEASUREMENTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and pathologic results were measured pre- and post-HIFU. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 803 patients from six urologic departments met the inclusion criteria. Stratification according to d'Amico's risk group was low, intermediate, and high in 40.2%, 46.3%, and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Mean follow-up was 42+/-33 mo. Mean PSA nadir was 1.0+/-2.8 ng/ml with 54.3% reaching a nadir of < or =0.3 ng/ml. Control biopsies were negative in 85% of cases. The overall and cancer-specific survival rates at 8 yr were 89% and 99%, respectively. The metastasis-free survival rate at 8 yr was 97%. Initial PSA value and Gleason score value significantly influence the DFSR. The 5- and 7-yr biochemical-free survival rates (Phoenix criteria) were 83-75%, 72-63%, and 68-62% (p=0.03) and the additional treatment-free survival rates were 84-79%, 68-61%, and 52-54% (p<0.001) for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. PSA nadir was a major predictive factor for HIFU success: negative biopsies, stable PSA, and no additional therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Local control and DFSR achieved with HIFU were similar to those expected with conformal external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The excellent cancer-specific survival rate is also explained by the possibility to repeat HIFU and use salvage EBRT. Copyright 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging treatment for select patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVES: To report the oncologic outcome of HIFU as a primary care option for localized prostate cancer from a multicenter database. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with localized PCa treated with curative intent and presenting at least a 2-yr follow-up from February 1993 were considered in this study. Previously irradiated patients were excluded from this analysis. In case of any residual or recurrent PCa, patients were systematically offered a second session. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine disease-free survival rates (DFSR). MEASUREMENTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and pathologic results were measured pre- and post-HIFU. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 803 patients from six urologic departments met the inclusion criteria. Stratification according to d'Amico's risk group was low, intermediate, and high in 40.2%, 46.3%, and 13.5% of patients, respectively. Mean follow-up was 42+/-33 mo. Mean PSA nadir was 1.0+/-2.8 ng/ml with 54.3% reaching a nadir of < or =0.3 ng/ml. Control biopsies were negative in 85% of cases. The overall and cancer-specific survival rates at 8 yr were 89% and 99%, respectively. The metastasis-free survival rate at 8 yr was 97%. Initial PSA value and Gleason score value significantly influence the DFSR. The 5- and 7-yr biochemical-free survival rates (Phoenix criteria) were 83-75%, 72-63%, and 68-62% (p=0.03) and the additional treatment-free survival rates were 84-79%, 68-61%, and 52-54% (p<0.001) for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. PSA nadir was a major predictive factor for HIFU success: negative biopsies, stable PSA, and no additional therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Local control and DFSR achieved with HIFU were similar to those expected with conformal external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The excellent cancer-specific survival rate is also explained by the possibility to repeat HIFU and use salvage EBRT. Copyright 2010 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner Journal: Med Phys Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Oliver D Kripfgans; Man Zhang; Mario L Fabiilli; Paul L Carson; Frederic Padilla; Scott D Swanson; Charles Mougenot; J Brian Fowlkes; Charles Mougenot Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Graham Sommer; Donna Bouley; Harcharan Gill; Bruce Daniel; Kim Butts Pauly; Chris Diederich Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.344