Literature DB >> 20619747

The increase in dural sac area is maintained at 2 years after X-stop implantation for the treatment of spinal stenosis with no significant alteration in lumbar spine range of movement.

Anjali Nandakumar1, Natasha Annette Clark, Jeetender Pal Peehal, Naval Bilolikar, Douglas Wardlaw, Francis W Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The X-stop interspinous process decompression (IPD) device has been used effectively in the management of symptomatic spinal stenosis. This study examines the radiological outcomes at 2 years postoperatively after X-stop implantation.
PURPOSE: To measure the effect of X-stop IPD device on the dural sac and foraminal areas at 24 months postoperatively at instrumented level in symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis. We also aimed to assess its effect on change in lumbar spine movement. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-eight patients treated with X-stop had preoperative positional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 40 of whom had 2 years postoperative positional MRI scans. Complete scans were available for 39 of these patients. OUTCOME MEASURES: Positional MRI scans were performed pre- and postoperatively. Measurements were done on these scans and are presented as the outcome measures.
METHODS: All patients had a multipositional MRI scan preoperatively and at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Foraminal area was measured in flexion and extension. Dural cross-sectional area was measured in standing erect and in sitting neutral, flexion, and extension (sitting) positions. The total range of movement (ROM) of the lumbar spine and individual segments was also measured.
RESULTS: Complete scan data for 39 patients' scans were available. An increase in mean dural sac area was found in all positions. At 24 months after surgery, the mean dural sac area increased significantly in all four postures mentioned above. A small increase in mean foraminal area was noted, but this was not statistically significant. Mean anterior disc height reduced from 5.9 to 4.1 mm (p=.006) at 24 months at the instrumented level in single-level cases, from 7.7 to 6.1 mm (p=.032) in double-level cases caudally, and from 8.54 to 7.91 (p=.106) mm cranially. We hypothesize that the reduction in anterior disc heights could be a result of the natural progression of spinal stenosis with aging. There was no significant change in posterior disc heights at instrumented level or adjacent levels. The mean lumbar spine motion was 21.7 degrees preoperatively and 23 degrees at 24 months (p=.584) in single-level cases. This was 32.1 degrees to 31.1 degrees (p=.637) in double-level cases. There was no significant change in the individual segmental range of motion at instrumented and adjacent levels.
CONCLUSION: X-stop interspinous device remains effective in decompressing the stenosed spinal segment by increasing the anatomic dural cross-sectional area and foraminal area of spinal canal. It does not significantly alter the ROM of lumbar spine at instrumented and adjacent levels at 24 months postoperatively. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619747     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  6 in total

1.  The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Frederick L Mansfield; Guohua Lü; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Do in vivo kinematic studies provide insight into adjacent segment degeneration? A qualitative systematic literature review.

Authors:  Masoud Malakoutian; David Volkheimer; John Street; Marcel F Dvorak; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Effects of spine loading in a patient with post-decompression lumbar disc herniation: observations using an open weight-bearing MRI.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato; Daryl Sybert; Tim Law; Brian Clark
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Preliminary efficacy of inter-spinal distraction fusion which is a new technique for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Hongyu Wei; Hai Tang; Tidong Zhang; Hao Chen; Chunke Dong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.

Authors:  Hrafnhildur Hjaltadottir; Hanna Hebelka; Caroline Molinder; Helena Brisby; Adad Baranto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.