Literature DB >> 20619528

Environmental attitudes of stakeholders and their perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts: a case study in China.

Jing Liu1, Zhiyun Ouyang, Hong Miao.   

Abstract

Large numbers of people living in and around protected areas are highly dependent on the natural resources. However, simply excluding them from the area management has always inevitably resulted in conflicts. We conducted a case study of the Protected Area of Jinyun Mountain (PJM) in China to evaluate social context variables, environmental attitudes, and perceptions regarding protected area-community conflicts. Data were collected through questionnaire surveys administered to four stakeholder groups (i.e. local farmers, government staff, business persons, and tourists). A total of 112 questionnaires were completed in December 2008, after the Sichuan Earthquake. The questionnaire consisted of three parts, social context (gender, race, age, income, and education level), protected area-community conflicts, and environmental attitudes. The New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scores, which were employed to evaluate environmental attitudes, differed significantly among the stakeholder groups (P<0.01). Specifically, government staff reported the highest and business persons did the lowest. Among the five items evaluated, anti-exemptionalism received the lowest score, while nature's balance did the highest. Evaluation of the protected area-community relationship indicated that harmony and conflict both exist in the PJM, but have different forms among different stakeholders, and seem to be opposite between government staff and local farmers. Among the indexes, tourism primarily contributed to the harmonious aspect, while collection of NTFPs did to the conflicting one. Conflict scores were positively related to age and negatively related to education level. Respondents with higher NEP scores were more partial to the park management. Besides, the respondents with higher annual incomes tended to support the policy of harmonizing the relationship and lessening the harm of local communities to the area. To promote proenvironmental attitudes and alleviate the protected area-community conflicts, we recommend improving environmental education, establishing community co-management, and launching substitute sources of cash for traditional cultivation. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619528     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  7 in total

Review 1.  Compensation payments for downsides generated by protected areas.

Authors:  Peter Pechacek; Guo Li; Junsheng Li; Wei Wang; Xiaopu Wu; Jing Xu
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  The environmental pollution perception of residents in coal mining areas: a case study in the Hancheng mine area, Shaanxi Province, China.

Authors:  Xingmin Shi; Fei He
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Predicting Hotspots of Human-Elephant Conflict to Inform Mitigation Strategies in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Jorgelina Marino; Yong Chen; Qing Tao; Casey D Sullivan; Kun Shi; David W Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Linking stormwater Best Management Practices to social factors in two suburban watersheds.

Authors:  P Kanoko Maeda; Victoria Chanse; Amanda Rockler; Hubert Montas; Adel Shirmohammadi; Sacoby Wilson; Paul T Leisnham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Disputed Territories in Southeastern Brazil: Effects of the Serra da Bocaina National Park on Nearby Coastal Communities.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues de Freitas; Luciana Gomes de Araujo
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Strategic protection of landslide vulnerable mountains for biodiversity conservation under land-cover and climate change impacts.

Authors:  Binbin V Li; Clinton N Jenkins; Weihua Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation.

Authors:  S A Dhenge; S N Ghadge; M C Ahire; S D Gorantiwar; M G Shinde
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.080

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.