Literature DB >> 20619268

Sex-specific differences in nutrient regulation in a capital breeding caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius).

Kwang Pum Lee1.   

Abstract

Nutrient requirements by male and female insects are likely to differ, but relatively little is known regarding how sexes differ in their regulation of macronutrient acquisition. The present study reports the results from a laboratory experiment in which behavioural and physiological components of nutrient regulation were compared between male and female caterpillars of Spodoptera litura (Fabricius). When provided with choices between two nutritionally complementary foods (one is a protein-biased diet and the other a carbohydrate-biased diet), both males and females adjusted their food selection to defend an intake target. However, the composition of diet preferred by the two differed, with females selecting significantly more protein than males with no difference in carbohydrate intake between the two. When confined to single diets with varying mixtures of protein and carbohydrate [P:C ratios, expressed as the percentage of diet by dry mass: protein 42%:carbohydrate 0% (p42:c0), p35:c7, p28:c14, p21:c21, p14:c28, p7:c35], females consumed more macronutrients than did males across on all P:C diets except the extremely carbohydrate-biased diet (p7:c35). Under both choice and no-choice feeding condition, such sex differences in nutrient intake were not expressed until late in the feeding stage of the final stadium. Sexes also differed in post-ingestive utilization of ingested nutrients. Females utilized ingested protein for body growth with greater efficiency compared to males, presumably reflecting provisioning their adult needs for protein to develop eggs, whereas males were more efficient at depositing lipids from carbohydrate intake than females. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619268     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2010.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  9 in total

1.  Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles.

Authors:  Kim Jensen; David Mayntz; Søren Toft; Fiona J Clissold; John Hunt; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genotype-by-sex-by-diet interactions for nutritional preference, dietary consumption, and lipid deposition in a field cricket.

Authors:  James Rapkin; Kim Jensen; Clarissa M House; Alastair J Wilson; John Hunt
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Selection of soybean pods by the stink bugs, Nezara viridula and Piezodorus guildinii.

Authors:  Gonzalo A R Molina; Eduardo V Trumper
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

4.  You are what you eat: diet shapes body composition, personality and behavioural stability.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Genetic variation in compensatory feeding for dietary dilution in a generalist caterpillar.

Authors:  Kwang Pum Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Effect of diet on the structure of animal personality.

Authors:  Chang S Han; Niels J Dingemanse
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  A Better Understanding of Bee Nutritional Ecology Is Needed to Optimize Conservation Strategies for Wild Bees-The Application of Ecological Stoichiometry.

Authors:  Michał Filipiak
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Physiological status is a stronger predictor of nutrient selection than ambient plant nutrient content for a wild herbivore.

Authors:  Marion Le Gall; Mira L Word; Alioune Beye; Arianne J Cease
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2020-11-04

9.  Dietary choice for a balanced nutrient intake increases the mean and reduces the variance in the reproductive performance of male and female cockroaches.

Authors:  Harriet Bunning; Lee Bassett; Christina Clowser; James Rapkin; Kim Jensen; Clarissa M House; Catharine R Archer; John Hunt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.