CONTEXT: Quality care for patients with cancer is a national priority-for those with noncurable cancer, the stakes are even higher. Strategies to promote integration of palliative care into oncology practice may enhance quality. We have developed a model in which palliative care services are integrated into the private, office-based oncology practice setting. We have evaluated the feasibility and assessed outcomes for both the oncologists and the patients they serve. To our knowledge, an embedded clinic in an outpatient, private practice oncology clinic has not been described previously. OBJECTIVE: The primary outcomes assessed were 1) quality care outcomes through assessment of symptom burden and relief achieved through palliative care consultation, 2) provider satisfaction, 3) volume determined by number of palliative care consultations over time, and 4) time saved for the oncologist as a surrogate for the bottom line of the cancer practice. METHODS: Measurement of: symptom burden and relief with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), physician acceptance of palliative care services through a provider satisfaction survey and volume of referrals, and billing data to determine potential oncologists' time saved. RESULTS: Palliative care consultation was associated with a reduction in symptom burden by 21%, evidenced by decrease in average total ESAS score from 49.3 to 39. Median provider satisfaction scores rating components of palliative care ranged from 8.5 to 9/10, with an overall provider satisfaction of 9/10. Over the study period, the "embedded" oncology group consultation requests increased 87% (67-120), with each individual oncology provider nearly doubled. The total time saved for the oncology practice in Year 2 was just over four weeks (9720 minutes; 162 hours). CONCLUSION: An embedded palliative care clinic integrated into an office-based oncology practice is feasible and may improve the quality of care. Formal study of this service delivery model is warranted. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CONTEXT: Quality care for patients with cancer is a national priority-for those with noncurable cancer, the stakes are even higher. Strategies to promote integration of palliative care into oncology practice may enhance quality. We have developed a model in which palliative care services are integrated into the private, office-based oncology practice setting. We have evaluated the feasibility and assessed outcomes for both the oncologists and the patients they serve. To our knowledge, an embedded clinic in an outpatient, private practice oncology clinic has not been described previously. OBJECTIVE: The primary outcomes assessed were 1) quality care outcomes through assessment of symptom burden and relief achieved through palliative care consultation, 2) provider satisfaction, 3) volume determined by number of palliative care consultations over time, and 4) time saved for the oncologist as a surrogate for the bottom line of the cancer practice. METHODS: Measurement of: symptom burden and relief with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), physician acceptance of palliative care services through a provider satisfaction survey and volume of referrals, and billing data to determine potential oncologists' time saved. RESULTS: Palliative care consultation was associated with a reduction in symptom burden by 21%, evidenced by decrease in average total ESAS score from 49.3 to 39. Median provider satisfaction scores rating components of palliative care ranged from 8.5 to 9/10, with an overall provider satisfaction of 9/10. Over the study period, the "embedded" oncology group consultation requests increased 87% (67-120), with each individual oncology provider nearly doubled. The total time saved for the oncology practice in Year 2 was just over four weeks (9720 minutes; 162 hours). CONCLUSION: An embedded palliative care clinic integrated into an office-based oncology practice is feasible and may improve the quality of care. Formal study of this service delivery model is warranted. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Katie M Moynihan; Jennifer M Snaman; Erica C Kaye; Wynne E Morrison; Aaron G DeWitt; Loren D Sacks; Jess L Thompson; Jennifer M Hwang; Valerie Bailey; Deborah A Lafond; Joanne Wolfe; Elizabeth D Blume Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Dio Kavalieratos; Arif H Kamal; Amy P Abernethy; Andrea K Biddle; Timothy S Carey; Sandesh Dev; Bryce B Reeve; Morris Weinberger Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Oluwakemi A Fawole; Sydney M Dy; Renee F Wilson; Brandyn D Lau; Kathryn A Martinez; Colleen C Apostol; Daniela Vollenweider; Eric B Bass; Rebecca A Aslakson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 5.128