CONTEXT: Haloperidol is used commonly for the control of nausea and vomiting (N/V) in palliative care patients, but there is very little evidence to support its use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of haloperidol as an antiemetic in patients with cancer and N/V not related to cancer treatment. METHODS: Patients with an N/V score of at least 1 on a 4-point scale were prescribed either oral or subcutaneous haloperidol. N/V and toxicity were assessed daily for the duration of the study (maximum five days) by both the patient and an observer (health professional). RESULTS: At Day 2, 33 of 42 (79%) treated patients were assessable for response. Eight (24%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10%-39%) patients had complete control of N/V and 12 (36%; 95% CI: 20%-53%) had partial control, giving an overall response rate of 61% (95% CI: 44%-77%). At Day 5, 23 patients were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 17 of 23 (74%; 95% CI: 56%-92%). If all patients are included in the response analysis, the overall response rates at Days 2 and 5 were 47% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Haloperidol has some efficacy in the treatment of N/V in this patient group. The results from this uncontrolled study provide pilot data from which to plan future controlled trials of antiemetics in the palliative care population. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CONTEXT: Haloperidol is used commonly for the control of nausea and vomiting (N/V) in palliative care patients, but there is very little evidence to support its use. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of haloperidol as an antiemetic in patients with cancer and N/V not related to cancer treatment. METHODS:Patients with an N/V score of at least 1 on a 4-point scale were prescribed either oral or subcutaneous haloperidol. N/V and toxicity were assessed daily for the duration of the study (maximum five days) by both the patient and an observer (health professional). RESULTS: At Day 2, 33 of 42 (79%) treated patients were assessable for response. Eight (24%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10%-39%) patients had complete control of N/V and 12 (36%; 95% CI: 20%-53%) had partial control, giving an overall response rate of 61% (95% CI: 44%-77%). At Day 5, 23 patients were assessable for response. The overall response rate was 17 of 23 (74%; 95% CI: 56%-92%). If all patients are included in the response analysis, the overall response rates at Days 2 and 5 were 47% and 40%, respectively. CONCLUSION:Haloperidol has some efficacy in the treatment of N/V in this patient group. The results from this uncontrolled study provide pilot data from which to plan future controlled trials of antiemetics in the palliative care population. Copyright 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Hanno Riess; Cihan Ay; Rupert Bauersachs; Cecilia Becattini; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Francis Cajfinger; Ian Chau; Alexander T Cohen; Alok A Khorana; Anthony Maraveyas; Marcos Renni; Annie M Young Journal: Oncologist Date: 2018-04-12
Authors: Declan Walsh; Mellar Davis; Carla Ripamonti; Eduardo Bruera; Andrew Davies; Alex Molassiotis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 3.603