Literature DB >> 20619009

[Trends in the number of knee and hip arthroplasties: considerably more knee and hip prostheses due to osteoarthritis in 2030].

Renee Otten1, Peter M van Roermund, H Susan J Picavet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To predict the future number of knee and hip arthroplasties due to osteoarthritis (OA) in the Netherlands based on historical trends and demographic projections.
DESIGN: Data analysis and model calculations.
METHOD: Two future projections were based on age and sex-specific number of hospital admissions for the placement of total knee or hip prostheses due to OA between 1995 and 2005; data were obtained from the Dutch National Medical Registration (LMR). The demographical projection was based on the incidence of arthroplasty in 2005 combined with demographic predictions from Statistics Netherlands regarding the time period between 2005 and 2030. The trend projection used the trend in the age and sex-specific incidence of surgery between 1995 and 2005.
RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2005, the annual number of knee arthroplasties in patients with a primary diagnose of OA increased from 4,916 to 14,565, an increase of 196%. The total number of hip arthroplasties increased from 13,785 to 20,715, an increase of 50%. The demographical projection suggests that the number of total hip arthroplasties will increase to 31,731 by 2030, an increase of 53%, and the number of knee arthroplasties to 22,183. The trend projection suggests that the numbers may increase to 51,680 for the hip (+149%) and to 57,893 for the knee (+297%).
CONCLUSION: The increase in the number of knee and hip arthroplasties due to OA will probably continue in the coming 20 years. The following developments will probably contribute to this: demographical changes, the increase in overweight, improved long-term outcomes of arthroplasty, more active lifestyle of the elderly and the increasing number of orthopaedic surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd        ISSN: 0028-2162


  43 in total

1.  Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Arthur J Kievit; Stefan J M Breugem; Inger N Sierevelt; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Sebastiaan A W van de Groes; Keetie C A L C Kremers; Sander Koëter; Daniel Haverkamp
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Large variability in recommendations for return to daily life activities after knee arthroplasty among Dutch hospitals and clinics: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  A Carlien Straat; Denise J M Smit; Pieter Coenen; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Johannes R Anema; P Paul F M Kuijer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.925

3.  Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B Boonen; M G M Schotanus; B Kerens; W van der Weegen; R A M van Drumpt; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Recovery Courses of Patients Who Return to Work by 3, 6 or 12 Months After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  T H Hylkema; M Stevens; J van Beveren; P C Rijk; R W Brouwer; S K Bulstra; P P F M Kuijer; S Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-30

5.  Local application of BMP-2 specific plasmids in fibrin glue does not promote implant fixation.

Authors:  Benjamin Faensen; Britt Wildemann; Christian Hain; Julius Höhne; Yvonne Funke; Christan Plank; Axel Stemberger; Gerhard Schmidmaier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Complications after hip arthroplasty and the association with hospital procedure volume.

Authors:  Laura M de Vries; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Jan A N Verhaar; J Herre Kingma; Bruno H C Stricker
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 7.  Dutch guideline on total hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Bart A Swierstra; Anton M J S Vervest; Geert H I M Walenkamp; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter T J Spierings; Ide C Heyligers; Job L C van Susante; Harmen B Ettema; Mariette J Jansen; Pim J Hennis; Janneke de Vries; Sabrina B Muller-Ploeger; Margreet A Pols
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Designing a strategy to implement cost-effective blood transfusion management in elective hip and knee arthroplasties: a study protocol.

Authors:  Veronique M A Voorn; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Cynthia So-Osman; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Ankie W M M Koopman-van Gemert; Rob G H H Nelissen; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; A Brand; D P Engberts; W B van der Hout; A A Kaptein; J B A van Mourik
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.

Authors:  Alexander Buckenham Boyle; Mark Zhu; Chris Frampton; Andrew Vane; Vaughan Poutawera
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Authors:  Jason Verspeek; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Martijn F L Kuijpers; Wim H C Rijnen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.