Literature DB >> 20618912

Assessing uncertainties in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale limitations.

Rosie Fisher1, Nate McDowell, Drew Purves, Paul Moorcroft, Stephen Sitch, Peter Cox, Chris Huntingford, Patrick Meir, F Ian Woodward.   

Abstract

*Second-generation Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) have recently been developed that explicitly represent the ecological dynamics of disturbance, vertical competition for light, and succession. Here, we introduce a modified second-generation DGVM and examine how the representation of demographic processes operating at two-dimensional spatial scales not represented by these models can influence predicted community structure, and responses of ecosystems to climate change. *The key demographic processes we investigated were seed advection, seed mixing, sapling survival, competitive exclusion and plant mortality. We varied these parameters in the context of a simulated Amazon rainforest ecosystem containing seven plant functional types (PFTs) that varied along a trade-off surface between growth and the risk of starvation induced mortality. *Varying the five unconstrained parameters generated community structures ranging from monocultures to equal co-dominance of the seven PFTs. When exposed to a climate change scenario, the competing impacts of CO(2) fertilization and increasing plant mortality caused ecosystem biomass to diverge substantially between simulations, with mid-21st century biomass predictions ranging from 1.5 to 27.0 kg C m(-2). *Filtering the results using contemporary observation ranges of biomass, leaf area index (LAI), gross primary productivity (GPP) and net primary productivity (NPP) did not substantially constrain the potential outcomes. We conclude that demographic processes represent a large source of uncertainty in DGVM predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20618912     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  18 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating uncertainty in predictive species distribution modelling.

Authors:  Colin M Beale; Jack J Lennon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolution and challenges of dynamic global vegetation models for some aspects of plant physiology and elevated atmospheric CO2.

Authors:  L F C Rezende; B C Arenque; S T Aidar; M S B Moura; C Von Randow; E Tourigny; R S C Menezes; J P H B Ometto
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  The importance of including lianas in global vegetation models.

Authors:  Hans Verbeeck; Elizabeth Kearsley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Loss of whole-tree hydraulic conductance during severe drought and multi-year forest die-off.

Authors:  William R L Anderegg; Leander D L Anderegg; Joseph A Berry; Christopher B Field
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  How stand productivity results from size- and competition-dependent growth and mortality.

Authors:  John P Caspersen; Mark C Vanderwel; William G Cole; Drew W Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Liana optical traits increase tropical forest albedo and reduce ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  Félicien Meunier; Marco D Visser; Alexey Shiklomanov; Michael C Dietze; J Antonio Guzmán Q; G Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa; Hannes P T De Deurwaerder; Sruthi M Krishna Moorthy; Stefan A Schnitzer; David C Marvin; Marcos Longo; Chang Liu; Eben N Broadbent; Angelica M Almeyda Zambrano; Helene C Muller-Landau; Matteo Detto; Hans Verbeeck
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 13.211

7.  Prolonged experimental drought reduces plant hydraulic conductance and transpiration and increases mortality in a piñon-juniper woodland.

Authors:  Robert E Pangle; Jean-Marc Limousin; Jennifer A Plaut; Enrico A Yepez; Patrick J Hudson; Amanda L Boutz; Nathan Gehres; William T Pockman; Nate G McDowell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Empirical and process-based approaches to climate-induced forest mortality models.

Authors:  Henry D Adams; A Park Williams; Chonggang Xu; Sara A Rauscher; Xiaoyan Jiang; Nate G McDowell
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Growth-mortality relationships in piñon pine (Pinus edulis) during severe droughts of the past century: shifting processes in space and time.

Authors:  Alison K Macalady; Harald Bugmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses.

Authors:  Sanna Sevanto; Nate G McDowell; L Turin Dickman; Robert Pangle; William T Pockman
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 7.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.