Literature DB >> 20618349

Reproductive decision-making: a qualitative study among couples at increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma.

C J Dommering1, M R van den Heuvel, A C Moll, S M Imhof, H Meijers-Heijboer, L Henneman.   

Abstract

Little is known about the reproductive decision-making process of couples with an increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma (Rb). A qualitative study was conducted to explore the impact of prospective risk on reproductive decisions, factors influencing these decisions, and the needs of couples with regard to reproductive counselling. Fourteen couples of childbearing age who received genetic counselling between 2002 and 2006 participated in semi-structured interviews in 2008. The risk of having a child with Rb ranged from less than 1% to 50%. In most cases, the diagnosis of Rb influenced subsequent family planning. Prenatal diagnosis was used by two couples, while others refrained from having more children. Reproductive decisions were influenced by the burden of the disease for the patient and family members, the impact of ophthalmological screening under anaesthesia, and couples' perceived risk, which did not always relate to their actual risk. Reproductive choices with regard to the number of children wanted changed over time. Our findings indicate topics to be discussed during genetic counselling of couples at increased risk for a child with Rb. We suggest continued access to genetic counselling also after the initial diagnosis and treatment.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20618349     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01484.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  9 in total

1.  "My funky genetics": BRCA1/2 mutation carriers' understanding of genetic inheritance and reproductive merger in the context of new reprogenetic technologies.

Authors:  Allison Werner-Lin; Lisa R Rubin; Maya Doyle; Rikki Stern; Katie Savin; Karen Hurley; Michal Sagi
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Low penetrance hereditary retinoblastoma in a family: what should we consider in the genetic counselling process and follow up?

Authors:  C Serrano; J Alonso; G Gómez-Mariano; E Aguirre; O Diez; N Gadea; N Bosch; J Balmaña; B Graña
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Genetic risk.

Authors:  Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-08-15

5.  Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing for retinoblastoma compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Charlotte J Dommering; Lidewij Henneman; Annemarie H van der Hout; Marianne A Jonker; Carli M J Tops; Ans M W van den Ouweland; Rob B van der Luijt; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Frans B L Hogervorst; Egbert J W Redeker; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Annette C Moll; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Exploring the preferences of involved health professionals regarding the implementation of an online decision aid to support couples during reproductive decision-making in hereditary cancer: a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Kelly Reumkens; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Liesbeth A D M van Osch
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Genotyping of Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers Linked to RB1 Locus in Iranian Population.

Authors:  Saman Mohamad Zahery; Kioomars Saliminejad; Hamid Reza Khorram Khorshid; Ali Ahani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10

8.  Reproductive Decision Support: Preferences and Needs of Couples at Risk for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Geneticists.

Authors:  Kelly Reumkens; A J G van Oudheusden; J J G Gietel-Habets; M H E Tummers; C E M de Die-Smulders; L A D M van Osch
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care.

Authors:  Amal Matar; Anna T Höglund; Pär Segerdahl; Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.