Qingxing Xu1, Chi-Hwa Wang, Daniel Wayne Pack. 1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 600, S. Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Abstract
Gene therapy is a potential medical solution that promises new treatments and may hold the cure for many different types of diseases and disorders of the human race. However, gene therapy is still a growing medical field and the technology is still in its infancy. The main challenge for gene therapy is to find safe and effective vectors that are able to deliver genes to the specific cells and get them to express inside the cells. Due to safety concerns, synthetic delivery systems, rather than viral vectors, are preferred for gene delivery and significant efforts have been focused on the development of this field. However, we are faced with problems like low gene transfer efficiency, cytotoxicity and lack of cell-targeting capability for these synthetic delivery systems. Over the years, we have seen a variety of new and effective polymers which have been designed and synthesized specifically for gene delivery. Moreover, various strategies that aimed at enhancing their physicochemical properties, improving transfection efficiency, reducing cytotoxicity as well as incorporating functional groups that offer better targetability and higher cellular uptake are established. Here, we look at two potential polymeric carriers, chitosan and poly(amidoamine) dendrimers, which have been widely reported for gene delivery. For chitosan, the interest arises from their availability, excellent non-cytotoxicity profile, biodegradability and ease of modification. For poly(amidoamine) dendrimers, the interest arises from their ease of synthesis with controlled structure and size, minimal cytotoxicity, biodegradability and high transfection efficiencies. The latest developments on these polymers for gene delivery will be the main focus of this article.
Gene therapy is a potential medical solution that promises new treatments and may hold the cure for class="Species">many differeclass="Chemical">nt types of diseases aclass="Chemical">nd disorders of the class="Chemical">n class="Species">human race. However, gene therapy is still a growing medical field and the technology is still in its infancy. The main challenge for gene therapy is to find safe and effective vectors that are able to deliver genes to the specific cells and get them to express inside the cells. Due to safety concerns, synthetic delivery systems, rather than viral vectors, are preferred for gene delivery and significant efforts have been focused on the development of this field. However, we are faced with problems like low gene transfer efficiency, cytotoxicity and lack of cell-targeting capability for these synthetic delivery systems. Over the years, we have seen a variety of new and effective polymers which have been designed and synthesized specifically for gene delivery. Moreover, various strategies that aimed at enhancing their physicochemical properties, improving transfection efficiency, reducing cytotoxicity as well as incorporating functional groups that offer better targetability and higher cellular uptake are established. Here, we look at two potential polymeric carriers, chitosan and poly(amidoamine) dendrimers, which have been widely reported for gene delivery. For chitosan, the interest arises from their availability, excellent non-cytotoxicity profile, biodegradability and ease of modification. For poly(amidoamine) dendrimers, the interest arises from their ease of synthesis with controlled structure and size, minimal cytotoxicity, biodegradability and high transfection efficiencies. The latest developments on these polymers for gene delivery will be the main focus of this article.
Authors: Jinshu Mao; Liguo Zhao; Kang De Yao; Qingxin Shang; Guanghui Yang; Yilin Cao Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Marion G Ott; Manfred Schmidt; Kerstin Schwarzwaelder; Stefan Stein; Ulrich Siler; Ulrike Koehl; Hanno Glimm; Klaus Kühlcke; Andrea Schilz; Hana Kunkel; Sonja Naundorf; Andrea Brinkmann; Annette Deichmann; Marlene Fischer; Claudia Ball; Ingo Pilz; Cynthia Dunbar; Yang Du; Nancy A Jenkins; Neal G Copeland; Ursula Lüthi; Moustapha Hassan; Adrian J Thrasher; Dieter Hoelzer; Christof von Kalle; Reinhard Seger; Manuel Grez Journal: Nat Med Date: 2006-04-02 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Barbara C Baudner; J Coos Verhoef; Marzia M Giuliani; Samuele Peppoloni; Rino Rappuoli; Giuseppe Del Giudice; Hans E Junginger Journal: J Drug Target Date: 2005 Sep-Nov Impact factor: 5.121
Authors: Jie Liu; Catherine Gu; E Bernadette Cabigas; Karl D Pendergrass; Milton E Brown; Ying Luo; Michael E Davis Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Xiao-Xiang Zhang; Caroline M Lamanna; Richie E Kohman; Thomas J McIntosh; Xue Han; Mark W Grinstaff Journal: Soft Matter Date: 2013-05-05 Impact factor: 3.679