Literature DB >> 20617893

Implied motion activation in cortical area MT can be explained by visual low-level features.

Jeannette A M Lorteije1, Nick E Barraclough, Tjeerd Jellema, Mathijs Raemaekers, Jacob Duijnhouwer, Dengke Xiao, Mike W Oram, Martin J M Lankheet, David I Perrett, Richard J A van Wezel.   

Abstract

To investigate form-related activity in motion-sensitive cortical areas, we recorded cell responses to animate implied motion in macaque middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) cortex and investigated these areas using fMRI in humans. In the single-cell studies, we compared responses with static images of human or monkey figures walking or running left or right with responses to the same human and monkey figures standing or sitting still. We also investigated whether the view of the animate figure (facing left or right) that elicited the highest response was correlated with the preferred direction for moving random dot patterns. First, figures were presented inside the cell's receptive field. Subsequently, figures were presented at the fovea while a dynamic noise pattern was presented at the cell's receptive field location. The results show that MT neurons did not discriminate between figures on the basis of the implied motion content. Instead, response preferences for implied motion correlated with preferences for low-level visual features such as orientation and size. No correlation was found between the preferred view of figures implying motion and the preferred direction for moving random dot patterns. Similar findings were obtained in a smaller population of MST cortical neurons. Testing human MT+ responses with fMRI further corroborated the notion that low-level stimulus features might explain implied motion activation in human MT+. Together, these results suggest that prior human imaging studies demonstrating animate implied motion processing in area MT+ can be best explained by sensitivity for low-level features rather than sensitivity for the motion implied by animate figures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20617893     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Time perception of action photographs is more precise than that of still photographs.

Authors:  Alessandro Moscatelli; Laura Polito; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Action recognition by motion detection in posture space.

Authors:  Stefanie Theusner; Marc de Lussanet; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Implied motion perception from a still image in infancy.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Action observation: the less-explored part of higher-order vision.

Authors:  Artem Platonov; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Emergence of the ability to perceive dynamic events from still pictures in human infants.

Authors:  Nobu Shirai; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  An Event-Related Potential Study of the Neural Response to Inferred Motion in Visual Images of Varying Coherence.

Authors:  Lei Jia; Yufan Xu; John A Sweeney; Cheng Wang; Billy Sung; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-13

8.  Flexible Orientation Tuning of Visual Representations of Human Body Postures: Evidence From Long-Term Priming.

Authors:  Karl Verfaillie; Anja Daems
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.