Literature DB >> 20617858

Fondaparinux: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Kate McKeage1, Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson.   

Abstract

Fondaparinux (Arixtra) is an anticoagulant that selectively inhibits activated factor X, thereby interrupting the blood coagulation cascade. In OASIS-5, a large pivotal trial in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), subcutaneous fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily was noninferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily (both agents were administered over a mean of about 5 days in combination with antiplatelet therapy) in reducing death or ischaemic events at 9 days, and the efficacy was maintained for up to 6 months (study end). However, fondaparinux was associated with a significantly lower rate of bleeding than enoxaparin in the first 9 days, and at 3 and 6 months. This lower rate of bleeding led to lower long-term mortality and morbidity with fondaparinux than with enoxaparin. In modelled cost-utility analyses conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in Spain, France and the US with a lifetime horizon, fondaparinux once daily was predicted to be cost effective relative to enoxaparin twice daily with regard to the incremental cost per QALY gained. In Spain and the US, fondaparinux dominated enoxaparin (i.e. was less costly and more effective) and, in the French analysis, the incremental cost per QALY gained with fondaparinux versus enoxaparin was well within recommended thresholds. Results of short-term (6-month) cost analyses in the US and France also favoured fondaparinux over enoxaparin. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that base-case conclusions were robust over a range of parameter estimates and assumptions, including plausible variations in baseline risk of a cardiac event or baseline risk of bleeding. In conclusion, in patients with NSTE-ACS receiving antiplatelet therapy, fondaparinux was cost effective relative to enoxaparin in cost-utility analyses in Europe and the US. This cost advantage primarily reflects the lower rate of bleeding with fondaparinux than with enoxaparin and the lower rate of mortality and morbidity over the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20617858     DOI: 10.2165/11205130-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  15 in total

1.  National economic impact of tirofiban for unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation; example from the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Ameet Bakhai; Marcus D Flather; Julian R Collinson; Warren Stevens; Charles Normand; Evo Alemao; Robbin Itzler; Rami Ben-Joseph
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bassand; Christian W Hamm; Diego Ardissino; Eric Boersma; Andrzej Budaj; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Keith A A Fox; David Hasdai; E Magnus Ohman; Lars Wallentin; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Total first-year costs of acute coronary syndrome in a managed care setting.

Authors:  Lida R Etemad; Patrick L McCollam
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2005-05

4.  Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Salim Yusuf; Shamir R Mehta; Susan Chrolavicius; Rizwan Afzal; Janice Pogue; Christopher B Granger; Andrzej Budaj; Ron J G Peters; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Lars Wallentin; Campbell Joyner; Keith A A Fox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial.

Authors:  Shamir R Mehta; Christopher B Granger; John W Eikelboom; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Lars Wallentin; David P Faxon; Ron J G Peters; Andrzej Budaj; Rizwan Afzal; Susan Chrolavicius; Keith A A Fox; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Fondaparinux versus Enoxaparin in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: short-term cost and long-term cost-effectiveness using data from the Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes Investigators (OASIS-5) trial.

Authors:  Mark J Sculpher; Greta Lozano-Ortega; Jennifer Sambrook; Stephen Palmer; Orges Ormanidhi; Ameet Bakhai; Marcus Flather; P Gabriel Steg; Shamir R Mehta; William Weintraub
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  Enoxaparin: a review of its use in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Natalie J Carter; Paul L McCormack; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of anticoagulation strategies in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Carleton B Maxwell; David A Holdford; Michael A Crouch; Dipen A Patel
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 9.  Evidence-based medical therapy of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Vijay S Ramanath; Kim A Eagle
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 10.  Management of patients with unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a critical review of the 2007 ACC /AHA guidelines.

Authors:  J Hoekstra; M Cohen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increased major bleeding risk in patients with kidney dysfunction receiving enoxaparin: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philipp Hoffmann; Frieder Keller
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.953

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.