Kristiina Häyrinen1, Johanna Lammintakanen, Kaija Saranto. 1. Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland (Kuopio Campus), Savilahdentie 6 A 3krs., P.O. Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland. kristiina.hayrinen@uef.fi
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate whether nurses have documented patient care in compliance with the national nursing documentation model in electronic health records, which means the use of the nursing process and the use of standardized terminology in different phases of the nursing process. METHODS: The data were collected from a central hospital in 2003-2006. The data consist of the electronic nursing care plans of 67 neurological patients and 422 surgical patients. The data were analyzed using statistical methods and content analysis. RESULTS: Standardized electronic nursing documentation is based on the nursing process, although the use of the nursing process varies across patients. There is a lack of progress notes relating to needs assessment, the identification of nursing diagnoses and care aims, and the nursing interventions planned in the documentation. The standardized terminology is used in the documentation but inconsistencies emerge in the use of the different classifications. CONCLUSION: The national model for electronic nursing documentation is suitable for the documentation of patient care in nursing care plans. However, health care professionals need further training in documenting patient care according to the nursing process, and in using the terminology in order to increase patient safety and improve documentation.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate whether nurses have documented patient care in compliance with the national nursing documentation model in electronic health records, which means the use of the nursing process and the use of standardized terminology in different phases of the nursing process. METHODS: The data were collected from a central hospital in 2003-2006. The data consist of the electronic nursing care plans of 67 neurological patients and 422 surgical patients. The data were analyzed using statistical methods and content analysis. RESULTS: Standardized electronic nursing documentation is based on the nursing process, although the use of the nursing process varies across patients. There is a lack of progress notes relating to needs assessment, the identification of nursing diagnoses and care aims, and the nursing interventions planned in the documentation. The standardized terminology is used in the documentation but inconsistencies emerge in the use of the different classifications. CONCLUSION: The national model for electronic nursing documentation is suitable for the documentation of patient care in nursing care plans. However, health care professionals need further training in documenting patient care according to the nursing process, and in using the terminology in order to increase patient safety and improve documentation.
Authors: Patricia C Dykes; Lipika Samal; Moreen Donahue; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Ann C Hurley; Omar Hasan; Terrance A O'Malley; Arjun K Venkatesh; Lynn A Volk; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jessica M Schwartz; Amanda J Moy; Sarah C Rossetti; Noémie Elhadad; Kenrick D Cato Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Hans Moen; Kai Hakala; Laura-Maria Peltonen; Henry Suhonen; Filip Ginter; Tapio Salakoski; Sanna Salanterä Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Hans Moen; Kai Hakala; Laura-Maria Peltonen; Hanna-Maria Matinolli; Henry Suhonen; Kirsi Terho; Riitta Danielsson-Ojala; Maija Valta; Filip Ginter; Tapio Salakoski; Sanna Salanterä Journal: J Biomed Semantics Date: 2020-09-01