Literature DB >> 20617109

The Changing "Face" of Aphasia Therapy.

Jaime B Lee1, Leora R Cherney.   

Abstract

A growing literature suggests that with intensive treatment, individuals with chronic aphasia continue to demonstrate language recovery for years post stroke. For example, Bhogal and colleagues conducted a literature review which suggests that intensive speech language therapy delivered over a short period of time (average of 8.8 hours per week for 11.2 weeks) resulted in significant improvements, while lower-intensity therapy provided over a longer period of time (average of 2 hours per week over 22.9 weeks) did not result in positive change (Bhogal, Teasell, Speechley, & Albert, 2003). Similarly, the constraint induced aphasia therapy data emphasize the importance of massed-practice in the improvement of language skills of individuals with chronic aphasia (Pulvermuller et al., 2001; Maher et al., 2006). However, providing intensive treatment to individuals with chronic aphasia can be costly, and the current healthcare environment in the United States is one which does not recognize its value. As a result, clinicians and researchers in the field are left searching for cost effective ways to deliver aphasia treatment. One method of providing less costly but intensive treatment is via the computer.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20617109      PMCID: PMC2898202          DOI: 10.1044/nnsld18.1.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord        ISSN: 1940-7769


  6 in total

1.  Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery.

Authors:  Sanjit K Bhogal; Robert Teasell; Mark Speechley
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller; B Neininger; T Elbert; B Mohr; B Rockstroh; P Koebbel; E Taub
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Knowledge of scripts reflected in discourse of aphasics and right-brain-damaged patients.

Authors:  E Lojek-Osiejuk
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Aphasic and non-brain-damaged adults' knowledge of scripts for common situations.

Authors:  S R Armus; R H Brookshire; L E Nicholas
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  A pilot study of use-dependent learning in the context of Constraint Induced Language Therapy.

Authors:  Lynn M Maher; Diane Kendall; Jennifer A Swearengin; Amy Rodriguez; Susan A Leon; Karyn Pingel; Audrey Holland; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Anita S Halper; Audrey L Holland; Ron Cole
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.408

  6 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Is There a Research-Practice Dosage Gap in Aphasia Rehabilitation?

Authors:  Robert Cavanaugh; Christina Kravetz; Lillian Jarold; Yina Quique; Rose Turner; William S Evans
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Novel technology for treating individuals with aphasia and concomitant cognitive deficits.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Anita S Halper
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.119

3.  Impact of Personal Relevance on Acquisition and Generalization of Script Training for Aphasia: A Preliminary Analysis.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney; Rosalind C Kaye; Jaime B Lee; Sarel van Vuuren
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 4.  An overview of the digital solutions for helping people with aphasia through bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Ikram Asghar; Oche A Egaji; Mark Griffiths
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2021-01-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.