| Literature DB >> 20617048 |
Noel B Sammon1, Keith M Harrower, Larelle D Fabbro, Rob H Reed.
Abstract
Drinking water quality is usually determined by its pathogenic bacterial content. However, the potential of water-borne spores as a source of nosocomial fungal infection is increasingly being recognised. This study into the incidence of microfungal contaminants in a typical Australian municipal water supply was carried out over an 18 month period. Microfungal abundance was estimated by the membrane filtration method with filters incubated on malt extract agar at 25 degrees C for seven days. Colony forming units were recovered from all parts of the system and these were enumerated and identified to genus level. The most commonly recovered genera were Cladosporium, Penicillium, Aspergillus and Fusarium. Nonparametric multivariate statistical analyses of the data using MDS, PCA, BEST and bubble plots were carried out with PRIMER v6 software. Positive and significant correlations were found between filamentous fungi, yeasts and bacteria. This study has demonstrated that numerous microfungal genera, including those that contain species which are opportunistic human pathogens, populate a typical treated municipal water supply in sub-tropical Australia.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus; drinking water; human pathogens; immunosuppressed; microfungi; nosocomial mycoses
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20617048 PMCID: PMC2872362 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph7041597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Microfungi recovered and identified during the period May 2007 to February 2008 inclusive.
| Mains | Reservoirs | Treated water ex Treatment Plant | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFU | % | CFU | % | CFU | % | |
| 333 | 37.8 | 967 | 44.4 | 13 | 37.1 | |
| 81 | 9.2 | 315 | 14.5 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 36 | 4.1 | 119 | 5.5 | 2 | 5.7 | |
| 11 | 1.2 | 18 | 0.8 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 27 | 3.1 | 43 | 2.0 | 5 | 14.3 | |
| 28 | 3.2 | 39 | 1.8 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 22 | 2.5 | 34 | 1.6 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 29 | 3.3 | 31 | 1.4 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 44 | 5.0 | 8 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 8 | 0.9 | 26 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 6 | 0.7 | 30 | 1.4 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| Other genera < 1% | 120 | 13.6 | 103 | 4.7 | 3 | 8.6 |
| Asporogenous colonies | 136 | 15.4 | 443 | 20.4 | 12 | 34.3 |
| Total filamentous fungi | 881 | 100 | 2176 | 100 | 35 | 100 |
| Yeasts/yeast-like fungi | 151 | 2,699 | ||||
| Total microfungi | 1,032 | 4,875 | ||||
Figure 1.Means of filamentous fungi and yeasts recovered from reservoir and treatment plant sites compared with mean free chlorine concentrations. Error bars = standard error.
Results of MDS and BEST analyses of environmental data for the three site groups.
| MDS Biological | MDS Environmental | BEST analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stress | Stress | No. of var. | Corr. | Selection (variables) | ||||
| Min. | Measured | Min. | Measured | |||||
| MAINS | ||||||||
| 0.01 | 3-d | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3-d | 0.11 | 1 | 0.476 | 6 |
| 2-d | 0.01 | 2-d | 0.20 | 2 | 0.428 | 5, 6 | ||
| 3 | 0.426 | 1, 5, 6 | ||||||
| 2 | 0.399 | 1, 6 | ||||||
| Significance level = 0.001 | ||||||||
| RESERVOIRS | ||||||||
| 0.01 | 3-d | 0.00 | 0.01 | 3-d | 0.10 | 1 | 0.291 | 6 |
| 2-d | 0.01 | 2-d | 0.20 | 2 | 0.265 | 5, 6 | ||
| 3 | 0.235 | 2, 5, 6 | ||||||
| 4 | 0.229 | 1, 2, 5, 6 | ||||||
| Significance level = 0.001 | ||||||||
| TREATMENT PLANT | ||||||||
| 0.01 | 3-d | 0.04 | 0.01 | 3-d | 0.08 | 1 | 0.725 | 6 |
| 2-d | 0.06 | 2-d | 0.17 | 2 | 0.650 | 5, 6 | ||
| 1 | 0.636 | 5 | ||||||
| 3 | 0.634 | 3, 5, 6 | ||||||
| Significance level = 0.001 | ||||||||
Results of Principal Components analyses of environmental data for the three site groups.
| Principal components analyses | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC No | Eigen values | % var | Cum % var | Variables | Eigenvectors | |||||
| PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 | PC5 | ||||||
| MAINS | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2.06 | 34.3 | 34.3 | 1 | Temp | −0.254 | −0.546 | −0.129 | 0.668 | −0.418 |
| 2 | 1.33 | 22.2 | 56.5 | 2 | Cond | 0.088 | 0.484 | 0.485 | 0.667 | 0.234 |
| 3 | 1.14 | 19.0 | 75.5 | 3 | DO conc | −0.337 | −0.546 | 0.410 | −0.105 | 0.629 |
| 4 | 0.847 | 14.1 | 89.6 | 4 | pH | 0.419 | −0.129 | −0.623 | 0.237 | 0.495 |
| 5 | 0.416 | 6.9 | 96.6 | 5 | ORP | −0.598 | 0.280 | −0.191 | −0.113 | −0.102 |
| 6 | Free Cl2 | −0.530 | 0.273 | −0.395 | 0.172 | 0.346 | ||||
| RESERVOIRS | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2.24 | 37.3 | 37.3 | 1 | Temp | −0.349 | 0.244 | −0.254 | −0.768 | 0.401 |
| 2 | 1.49 | 24.8 | 62.1 | 2 | Cond | 0.141 | −0.266 | 0.805 | −0.486 | −0.146 |
| 3 | 0.972 | 16.2 | 78.4 | 3 | DO conc | −0.450 | 0.523 | 0.102 | −0.020 | −0.704 |
| 4 | 0.905 | 15.1 | 93.4 | 4 | pH | 0.403 | −0.327 | −0.521 | −0.388 | −0.542 |
| 5 | 0.256 | 4.3 | 97.7 | 5 | ORP | −0.481 | −0.514 | −0.042 | 0.149 | 0.043 |
| 6 | Free Cl2 | −0.512 | −0.474 | −0.064 | −0.038 | −0.162 | ||||
| TREATMENT PLANT | ||||||||||
| 1 | 1.98 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 1 | Temp | −0.038 | 0.544 | −0.419 | 0.642 | −0.339 |
| 2 | 1.72 | 28.6 | 61.6 | 2 | Cond | −0.231 | −0.404 | −0.566 | −0.340 | −0.562 |
| 3 | 1.27 | 21.2 | 82.8 | 3 | DO conc | 0.089 | 0.465 | −0.547 | −0.492 | 0.484 |
| 4 | 0.517 | 8.6 | 91.4 | 4 | pH | −0.233 | −0.508 | −0.386 | 0.465 | 0.568 |
| 5 | 0.46 | 7.7 | 99.1 | 5 | ORP | 0.685 | −0.135 | −0.061 | 0.121 | 0.027 |
| 6 | Free Cl2 | 0.643 | −0.219 | −0.227 | 0.024 | −0.112 | ||||
Figure 2.PCA ordinations of environmental data superimposed with bubble plots of estimated filamentous microfungi and yeast/yeast-like microfungi. The alpha and numeric labels signify individual sites and their monthly sample data.
Figure 3.Histogram of the null hypothesis distribution of the test statistic using reservoirs data and showing real ρ as a vertical line at 0.291. 999 permutations, α = 0.001.