Literature DB >> 20616654

Does pressure matter in creating burns in a porcine model?

Adam J Singer1, Breena R Taira, Ryon Anderson, Steve A McClain, Lior Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Multiple animal models of burn injury have been reported, and only some of these have been fully validated. One of the most popular approaches is burn infliction by direct contact with the heat source. Previous investigators have reported that the pressure of application of the contact burn infliction device does not affect the depth of injury. We hypothesized that the depth of injury would increase with increasing pressure of application in a porcine burn model. Forty mid-dermal contact burns measuring 25 x 25 mm were created on the back and flanks of an anesthetized domestic pig (50 kg) using a brass bar preheated in 80 degrees C water for a period of 30 or 20 seconds. The bars were applied using a spring-loaded device designed to control the amount of pressure applied to the skin. The pressures applied by the brass bar were gravity (0.2 kg), 2.0, 2.7, 3.8, and 4.5 kg in replicates of eight. One hour later, 8-mm full-thickness biopsies were obtained for histologic analysis using Elastic Van Gieson staining by a board-certified dermatopathologist masked to burn conditions. The depth of complete and partial collagen injury was measured from the level of the basement membrane using a microscopic micrometer measuring lens. Groups were compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). The association between depth of injury and pressure was determined with Pearson correlations. The mean (95% confidence interval) depths of complete collagen injury with 30-second exposures were as follows: gravity only, 0.51 (0.39-0.66) mm; 2.0 kg, 0.72 (0.55-0.88) mm; 2.7 kg, 0.68 (0.55-1.00) mm; 3.8 kg, 0.92 (0.80-1.00) mm; and 4.5 kg, 1.65 (1.55-1.75) mm. The differences in depth of injury between the various pressure groups were significant (ANOVA, P < .001). The mean (95% confidence interval) depths of partial collagen injury were as follows: gravity only, 1.10 (0.92-1.30) mm; 2.0 kg, 1.46 (1.28-1.63) mm; 2.7 kg, 1.51 (1.34-1.64) mm; 3.8 kg, 1.82 (1.71-1.94) mm; and 4.5 kg, 2.50 (2.39-2.62) mm; and ANOVA, P = .001. The associations between pressure of application and depth of complete and partial collagen injury were 0.73 (P < .001) and 0.65 (P < .001), respectively. There is a direct association between the pressure of burn device application and depth of injury. Future studies should standardize and specify the amount of pressure applied using the burn infliction device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20616654     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181e4ca73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  8 in total

1.  Differentiation of burn wounds in an in vivo porcine model using terahertz spectroscopy.

Authors:  Omar B Osman; Timothy Jack Tan; Sam Henry; Adelaide Warsen; Navid Farr; Abbi M McClintic; Yak-Nam Wang; Saman Arbabi; M Hassan Arbab
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Comparing the reported burn conditions for different severity burns in porcine models: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine J Andrews; Leila Cuttle
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-07-23       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  How to create burn porcine models: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Wardhana; R F M Lumbuun; D Kurniasari
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2018-03-31

4.  Validation of a vertical progression porcine burn model.

Authors:  Adam J Singer; Douglas Hirth; Steve A McClain; Laurie Crawford; Fubao Lin; Richard A F Clark
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Novel burn device for rapid, reproducible burn wound generation.

Authors:  J Y Kim; D M Dunham; D M Supp; C K Sen; H M Powell
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 6.  Thermal injury of skin and subcutaneous tissues: A review of experimental approaches and numerical models.

Authors:  Hanglin Ye; Suvranu De
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.744

7.  Wound-healing Activity of Zanthoxylum bungeanum Maxim Seed Oil on Experimentally Burned Rats.

Authors:  Xiao-Qiang Li; Rong Kang; Jun-Cheng Huo; Yan-Hua Xie; Si-Wang Wang; Wei Cao
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.085

8.  Design and Testing of an Experimental Steam-Induced Burn Model in Rats.

Authors:  Vlad Porumb; Alexandru Florentin Trandabăț; Cristina Terinte; Irina Draga Căruntu; Elena Porumb-Andrese; Mihail Gabriel Dimofte; Dragoş Pieptu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.