MOTIVATION: Splice variation plays important roles in evolution and cancer. Different splice variants of a gene may be characteristic of particular cellular processes, subcellular locations or organs. Although several genomic projects have identified splice variants, there have been no large-scale computational studies of the relationship between number of splice variants and biological function. The Gene Ontology (GO) and tools for leveraging GO, such as GoMiner, now make such a study feasible. RESULTS: We partitioned genes into two groups: those with numbers of splice variants <or=b and >b (b=1,..., 10). Then we used GoMiner to determine whether any GO categories are enriched in genes with particular numbers of splice variants. Since there was no a priori 'appropriate' partition boundary, we studied those 'robust' categories whose enrichment did not depend on the selection of a particular partition boundary. Furthermore, because the distribution of splice variant number was a snapshot taken at a particular point in time, we confirmed that those observations were stable across successive builds of GenBank. A small number of categories were found for genes in the lower partitions. A larger number of categories were found for genes in the higher partitions. Those categories were largely associated with cell death and signal transduction. Apoptotic genes tended to have a large repertoire of splice variants, and genes with splice variants exhibited a distinctive 'apoptotic island' in clustered image maps (CIMs). AVAILABILITY: Supplementary tables and figures are available at URL http://discover.nci.nih.gov/OG/supplementaryMaterials.html. The Safari browser appears to perform better than Firefox for these particular items.
MOTIVATION: Splice variation plays important roles in evolution and cancer. Different splice variants of a gene may be characteristic of particular cellular processes, subcellular locations or organs. Although several genomic projects have identified splice variants, there have been no large-scale computational studies of the relationship between number of splice variants and biological function. The Gene Ontology (GO) and tools for leveraging GO, such as GoMiner, now make such a study feasible. RESULTS: We partitioned genes into two groups: those with numbers of splice variants <or=b and >b (b=1,..., 10). Then we used GoMiner to determine whether any GO categories are enriched in genes with particular numbers of splice variants. Since there was no a priori 'appropriate' partition boundary, we studied those 'robust' categories whose enrichment did not depend on the selection of a particular partition boundary. Furthermore, because the distribution of splice variant number was a snapshot taken at a particular point in time, we confirmed that those observations were stable across successive builds of GenBank. A small number of categories were found for genes in the lower partitions. A larger number of categories were found for genes in the higher partitions. Those categories were largely associated with cell death and signal transduction. Apoptotic genes tended to have a large repertoire of splice variants, and genes with splice variants exhibited a distinctive 'apoptotic island' in clustered image maps (CIMs). AVAILABILITY: Supplementary tables and figures are available at URL http://discover.nci.nih.gov/OG/supplementaryMaterials.html. The Safari browser appears to perform better than Firefox for these particular items.
Authors: Michael L Tress; Pier Luigi Martelli; Adam Frankish; Gabrielle A Reeves; Jan Jaap Wesselink; Corin Yeats; Páll Isólfur Olason; Mario Albrecht; Hedi Hegyi; Alejandro Giorgetti; Domenico Raimondo; Julien Lagarde; Roman A Laskowski; Gonzalo López; Michael I Sadowski; James D Watson; Piero Fariselli; Ivan Rossi; Alinda Nagy; Wang Kai; Zenia Størling; Massimiliano Orsini; Yassen Assenov; Hagen Blankenburg; Carola Huthmacher; Fidel Ramírez; Andreas Schlicker; France Denoeud; Phil Jones; Samuel Kerrien; Sandra Orchard; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Alexandre Reymond; Ewan Birney; Søren Brunak; Rita Casadio; Roderic Guigo; Jennifer Harrow; Henning Hermjakob; David T Jones; Thomas Lengauer; Christine A Orengo; László Patthy; Janet M Thornton; Anna Tramontano; Alfonso Valencia Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: G Merdzhanova; V Edmond; S De Seranno; A Van den Broeck; L Corcos; C Brambilla; E Brambilla; S Gazzeri; B Eymin Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: José Manuel Fernández-Real; Marek Straczkowski; Begoña Lainez; Matilde R Chacón; Irina Kowalska; Abel López-Bermejo; Antonio García-España; Agnieszka Nikolajuk; Ida Kinalska; Wifredo Ricart Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 6.664
Authors: Yan Wu; Andrea T Hooper; Zhaojing Zhong; Larry Witte; Peter Bohlen; Shahin Rafii; Daniel J Hicklin Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2006-10-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: P Carninci; T Kasukawa; S Katayama; J Gough; M C Frith; N Maeda; R Oyama; T Ravasi; B Lenhard; C Wells; R Kodzius; K Shimokawa; V B Bajic; S E Brenner; S Batalov; A R R Forrest; M Zavolan; M J Davis; L G Wilming; V Aidinis; J E Allen; A Ambesi-Impiombato; R Apweiler; R N Aturaliya; T L Bailey; M Bansal; L Baxter; K W Beisel; T Bersano; H Bono; A M Chalk; K P Chiu; V Choudhary; A Christoffels; D R Clutterbuck; M L Crowe; E Dalla; B P Dalrymple; B de Bono; G Della Gatta; D di Bernardo; T Down; P Engstrom; M Fagiolini; G Faulkner; C F Fletcher; T Fukushima; M Furuno; S Futaki; M Gariboldi; P Georgii-Hemming; T R Gingeras; T Gojobori; R E Green; S Gustincich; M Harbers; Y Hayashi; T K Hensch; N Hirokawa; D Hill; L Huminiecki; M Iacono; K Ikeo; A Iwama; T Ishikawa; M Jakt; A Kanapin; M Katoh; Y Kawasawa; J Kelso; H Kitamura; H Kitano; G Kollias; S P T Krishnan; A Kruger; S K Kummerfeld; I V Kurochkin; L F Lareau; D Lazarevic; L Lipovich; J Liu; S Liuni; S McWilliam; M Madan Babu; M Madera; L Marchionni; H Matsuda; S Matsuzawa; H Miki; F Mignone; S Miyake; K Morris; S Mottagui-Tabar; N Mulder; N Nakano; H Nakauchi; P Ng; R Nilsson; S Nishiguchi; S Nishikawa; F Nori; O Ohara; Y Okazaki; V Orlando; K C Pang; W J Pavan; G Pavesi; G Pesole; N Petrovsky; S Piazza; J Reed; J F Reid; B Z Ring; M Ringwald; B Rost; Y Ruan; S L Salzberg; A Sandelin; C Schneider; C Schönbach; K Sekiguchi; C A M Semple; S Seno; L Sessa; Y Sheng; Y Shibata; H Shimada; K Shimada; D Silva; B Sinclair; S Sperling; E Stupka; K Sugiura; R Sultana; Y Takenaka; K Taki; K Tammoja; S L Tan; S Tang; M S Taylor; J Tegner; S A Teichmann; H R Ueda; E van Nimwegen; R Verardo; C L Wei; K Yagi; H Yamanishi; E Zabarovsky; S Zhu; A Zimmer; W Hide; C Bult; S M Grimmond; R D Teasdale; E T Liu; V Brusic; J Quackenbush; C Wahlestedt; J S Mattick; D A Hume; C Kai; D Sasaki; Y Tomaru; S Fukuda; M Kanamori-Katayama; M Suzuki; J Aoki; T Arakawa; J Iida; K Imamura; M Itoh; T Kato; H Kawaji; N Kawagashira; T Kawashima; M Kojima; S Kondo; H Konno; K Nakano; N Ninomiya; T Nishio; M Okada; C Plessy; K Shibata; T Shiraki; S Suzuki; M Tagami; K Waki; A Watahiki; Y Okamura-Oho; H Suzuki; J Kawai; Y Hayashizaki Journal: Science Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Barry R Zeeberg; Haiying Qin; Sudarshan Narasimhan; Margot Sunshine; Hong Cao; David W Kane; Mark Reimers; Robert M Stephens; David Bryant; Stanley K Burt; Eldad Elnekave; Danielle M Hari; Thomas A Wynn; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Donn M Stewart; David Nelson; John N Weinstein Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Ari B Kahn; Michael C Ryan; Hongfang Liu; Barry R Zeeberg; D Curtis Jamison; John N Weinstein Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2007-03-05 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Eric T Wang; Rickard Sandberg; Shujun Luo; Irina Khrebtukova; Lu Zhang; Christine Mayr; Stephen F Kingsmore; Gary P Schroth; Christopher B Burge Journal: Nature Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962