Literature DB >> 20616325

Sex differences in patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque: in vivo 3.0-T magnetic resonance study.

Hideki Ota1, Mathew J Reeves, David C Zhu, Arshad Majid, Alonso Collar, Chun Yuan, J Kevin DeMarco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke prevention with carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic men with carotid stenosis is greater than in women. Men have a higher incidence of stroke <75 years of age. Sex differences in plaque characteristics may help explain this, because several plaque features, including a thin/ruptured fibrous cap, larger lipid-rich/necrotic core, and hemorrhage, are associated with increased risk of stroke. We hypothesize that MRI carotid plaque features will demonstrate sex differences indicative of higher-risk plaque in men.
METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients (men, 67; women, 64) with >or=50% asymptomatic carotid stenosis on duplex ultrasound were included. Two blinded reviewers interpreted multicontrast MRI. Presence of a thin/ruptured fibrous cap, plaque components (lipid-rich/necrotic core, hemorrhage, and calcification), and percent component volume were documented. The associations between sex and individual plaque characteristics were examined using logistic and linear regression models (2-part models) controlling for demographic characteristics and MR angiographic findings.
RESULTS: Presence of a thin/ruptured fibrous cap (48% versus 17%, adjusted OR=4.41, P<0.01) and lipid-rich/necrotic core (73% versus 50%, adjusted OR=3.66, P=0.01) were more common in men. There was a trend for more highly prevalent hemorrhage (33% versus, 17%, adjusted OR=2.15, P=0.07) in men. Calcification was not significantly associated with sex. Men demonstrated larger volumes of percent lipid-rich/necrotic core (median, 7.7% versus 3.2%, P=0.01), and percent hemorrhage (median, 6.1% versus 1.5%, P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with asymptomatic >or=50% carotid stenosis by duplex ultrasound, men had higher-risk plaque features compared with women after controlling for potential confounders. These findings may help explain sex differences in stroke incidence and prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20616325     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  25 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in cardiovascular ageing.

Authors:  Allison A Merz; Susan Cheng
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Age-Specific Sex Differences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Depicted Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Bowen Zhang; Isabella Kaminski; Kush Kapur; Stephanie Chiu; Pascal N Tyrrell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 3.  Carotid Artery Stenosis in Women.

Authors:  Michael J McArdle; Anne L Abbott; Zvonimir Krajcer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 4.  Symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery plaque.

Authors:  Majid M Mughal; Mohsin K Khan; J Kevin DeMarco; Arshad Majid; Fadi Shamoun; George S Abela
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-10

5.  High-resolution MRI assessed carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics comparing men and women with elevated ApoB levels.

Authors:  Tianwen Han; Pathmaja Paramsothy; Jaekyoung Hong; Daniel Isquith; Dongxiang Xu; Hua Bai; Moni Neradilek; Edward Gill; Xue-Qiao Zhao
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Gender differences in hypertension: myths and reality.

Authors:  Michael Doumas; Vasilios Papademetriou; Charles Faselis; Peter Kokkinos
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Sex differences in stroke: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Cheryl D Bushnell; Seemant Chaturvedi; Kathy R Gage; Paco S Herson; Patricia D Hurn; Monik C Jiménez; Steven J Kittner; Tracy E Madsen; Louise D McCullough; Mollie McDermott; Mathew J Reeves; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Clinical factors associated with high-risk carotid plaque features as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with established vascular disease (from the AIM-HIGH Study).

Authors:  Xue-Qiao Zhao; Thomas S Hatsukami; Daniel S Hippe; Jie Sun; Niranjan Balu; Daniel A Isquith; John R Crouse; Todd Anderson; John Huston; Nayak Polissar; Kevin O'Brien; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Sex differences of high-risk carotid atherosclerotic plaque with less than 50% stenosis in asymptomatic patients: an in vivo 3T MRI study.

Authors:  H Ota; M J Reeves; D C Zhu; A Majid; A Collar; C Yuan; J K DeMarco
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Management of Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis May Need to Be Individualized: A Multidisciplinary Call for Action.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Dimitri P Mikhailidis; Hediyeh Baradaran; Alun H Davies; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gianluca Faggioli; Jose Fernandes E Fernandes; Ajay Gupta; Mateja K Jezovnik; Stavros K Kakkos; Niki Katsiki; M Eline Kooi; Gaetano Lanza; Christos D Liapis; Ian M Loftus; Antoine Millon; Andrew N Nicolaides; Pavel Poredos; Rodolfo Pini; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Tatjana Rundek; Luca Saba; Francesco Spinelli; Francesco Stilo; Sherif Sultan; Clark J Zeebregts; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.