PURPOSE: To describe the differential completion rates and cost of sequential methods for a survey of adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization. METHODS: Four thousand randomly selected enrollees were invited to complete a mailed health survey. Techniques used to boost response included (1) a follow-up mailing, (2) varying the appearance of the survey, (3) reminder calls, and (4) phone calls to obtain parent and child consent and to administer the survey. We evaluated the outcome and costs of these methods. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-three enrollees (20%) completed the first mailed survey and 521 completed the second, increasing the overall response rate to 33%. Completion was significantly higher among respondents who received only the plain survey than those receiving only the color survey (P < .001). Reminder calls boosted response by 8%. Switching to administration of the survey by phone boosted response by 20% to 61%. The cost per completed survey was $29 for the first mailing, $26 after both mailings, $42 for mailings and reminder calls, and $48 for adding phone surveys. CONCLUSION: The response to mailings and reminder calls was low and the cost was high, with decreasing yield at each step, although some low-cost techniques were helpful. Results suggest phone surveys may be most effective among similar samples of adolescents.
PURPOSE: To describe the differential completion rates and cost of sequential methods for a survey of adolescents enrolled in a regional health care delivery organization. METHODS: Four thousand randomly selected enrollees were invited to complete a mailed health survey. Techniques used to boost response included (1) a follow-up mailing, (2) varying the appearance of the survey, (3) reminder calls, and (4) phone calls to obtain parent and child consent and to administer the survey. We evaluated the outcome and costs of these methods. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-three enrollees (20%) completed the first mailed survey and 521 completed the second, increasing the overall response rate to 33%. Completion was significantly higher among respondents who received only the plain survey than those receiving only the color survey (P < .001). Reminder calls boosted response by 8%. Switching to administration of the survey by phone boosted response by 20% to 61%. The cost per completed survey was $29 for the first mailing, $26 after both mailings, $42 for mailings and reminder calls, and $48 for adding phone surveys. CONCLUSION: The response to mailings and reminder calls was low and the cost was high, with decreasing yield at each step, although some low-cost techniques were helpful. Results suggest phone surveys may be most effective among similar samples of adolescents.
Authors: Nancy D Brener; Laura Kann; Steven A Kinchen; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Laura Whalen; Danice Eaton; Joseph Hawkins; James G Ross Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2004-09-24
Authors: Laura P Richardson; Carol Rockhill; Joan E Russo; David C Grossman; Julie Richards; Carolyn McCarty; Elizabeth McCauley; Wayne Katon Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Richa Gawande; My Ngoc To; Elizabeth Pine; Todd Griswold; Timothy B Creedon; Alexandra Brunel; Angela Lozada; Eric B Loucks; Zev Schuman-Olivier Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Abby R Rosenberg; Kira Bona; Claire M Wharton; Miranda Bradford; Michele L Shaffer; Joanne Wolfe; Kevin Scott Baker Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Gregory S Sawicki; Katharine C Garvey; Sara L Toomey; Kathryn A Williams; Yuefan Chen; J Lee Hargraves; Jessica Leblanc; Mark A Schuster; Jonathan A Finkelstein Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Helen M Parsons; Linda C Harlan; Susanne Schmidt; Theresa H M Keegan; Charles F Lynch; Erin E Kent; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Stephen M Schwartz; Roland L Chu; Gretchen Keel; Ashley Wilder Smith Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Gregory S Sawicki; Katharine C Garvey; Sara L Toomey; Kathryn A Williams; J Lee Hargraves; Thomas James; Jean L Raphael; Angelo P Giardino; Mark A Schuster; Jonathan A Finkelstein Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Carolyn A McCarty; Joan Russo; David C Grossman; Wayne Katon; Carol Rockhill; Elizabeth McCauley; Julie Richards; Laura Richardson Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Ashley Wilder Smith; Theresa Keegan; Ann Hamilton; Charles Lynch; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Stephen M Schwartz; Ikuko Kato; Rosemary Cress; Linda Harlan Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-10-07 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Thomas Fatkin; Sarah K Moore; Kayley Okst; Timothy B Creedon; Farah Samawi; Alaine Kiera Fredericksen; David Roll; Alexandra Oxnard; Benjamin Lê Cook; Zev Schuman-Olivier Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2021-04-15